Rhode Island Rolls Out Transparency Standards for Investment Managers

317px-Flag-map_of_Rhode_Island.svg

Rhode Island Treasurer Seth Magaziner has overhauled a portion of the state’s investment policy with a series of measured designed to encourage transparency from the investment managers trusted with state funds.

Under the new initiative, new managers – including those working with the state pension fund – will have to publicly disclose performance, fees and other data.

More from Pensions & Investments:

Mr. Magaziner’s “Transparent Treasury” initiative requires money managers wishing to do business with Rhode Island to publicly disclose information about their performance, fees, expenses and liquidity. Going forward, all fund managers will be required to sign a transparency pledge, agreeing to the release of this information before they will be allowed to oversee Rhode Island state investments.

[…]

“Going forward, Rhode Island will only do business with fund managers that allow us to publish information on performance, fees, expenses and liquidity,” said Mr. Magaziner in a phone interview.

In addition to requiring disclosures of all new funds in which Rhode Island invests, the treasurer’s office is currently in the process of reaching out to the state’s existing fund managers to ask them to voluntarily meet these new standards for current investments. Going forward, existing managers would also be required to provide the information for new investments, Mr. Magaziner said.

As a part of Mr. Magaziner’s transparency initiative, the treasury office will begin reporting fund expenses at an aggregate level immediately and on a fund-by-fund basis later this year.

The State Investment Commission, the body that oversees state pension investments, approved the transparency guidelines last week.

 

Photo credit: “Flag-map of Rhode Island” by Darwinek – self-made using Image:Flag of Rhode Island.svg and Image:USA Rhode Island location map.svg. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

Illinois Lawmakers Pass Bill to Slash Chicago’s Required Pension Payment By $200 Million

chicago

The city of Chicago, until this weekend, was on the hook for a $550 million payment to its police and fire pension funds due by 2016.

But state lawmakers are trying to cut the city a break, passing a bill that slashes the required payment to $330 million and spreading the rest over future years.

Some lawmakers praised the moved, but other parties – including Moody’s – thought it was a bad idea. From Bloomberg:

Mayor Rahm Emanuel had sought the payment reduction, which cuts to $330 million a scheduled additional contribution of $550 million to the police and fire funds due next year.

Cullerton, moments before the Senate voted, called the bill prudent.

“It’s not kicking the can down the road,” he said. “It’s restructuring the obligation to get these things funded, and it’s doing it in a way that’s responsible.”

But Senator Matt Murphy, a Republican from suburban Palatine, said the measure meant the city could avoid facing its crisis.

“This is nothing more than a pension holiday,” he said before the vote. “They need to start taking it seriously in Chicago. Otherwise, they’re going to be in a situation where bankruptcy does become real for these funds and maybe beyond.”

Pension liabilities have contributed to dramatic reductions in Chicago’s credit standing, and Moody’s Investors Service warned May 1 that delaying the day of reckoning was unwise.

“Any reduction in city contributions would have a deleterious effect on the plans’ already precarious condition,” Moody’s said in the report. “As the plans approach insolvency, risks to the city’s solvency will grow.”

The $220 million slashed from 2016’s payment will be spread out over future years. The bill has yet to reach the Governor’s desk.

 

Photo by bitsorf via Flickr CC License

Canada Pension Plan In Talks to Acquire General Electric Financial Unit

7408447448_8de1f6190e_z

The Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) is talking with General Electric about acquiring one of the firm’s financial arms. The deal, if it happens, could be worth $4 billion.

More from Bloomberg:

Canada Pension Plan Investment Board is in talks to buy General Electric Co.’s U.S. private-equity lending business as the company accelerates plans to shed most of its finance operations, people familiar with the matter said.

Canada Pension, the nation’s largest pension-fund manager, is working with Credit Suisse Group AG to arrange financing for a deal that would value the unit’s equity at more than $4 billion, said the people. That price doesn’t reflect liabilities tied to about $14 billion in assets that Canada Pension would assume with the U.S. portion of the so-called sponsor-finance business.

A sale agreement to Canada Pension hasn’t been completed and GE may decide to sell it to other bidders, the people said, asking not to be identified because the details aren’t public.

[…]

In pitching for the sponsors business, the Canadian fund manager has told GE that it would keep the business intact and would like to own it indefinitely, one person said. It also has said it wouldn’t expect to face any regulatory hurdles to a purchase, the person said.

A deal, with or without the CPPIB, could be announced this week, according to GE.

 

Photo by TaxCredits.net

Large U.S. Endowments Cut Private Equity in 2014

5857709536_81151f8166_z

Large U.S. Endowments cut their allocations to private equity in 2014 from 15 percent to 12 percent of total assets, according to a report from the Commonfund Institute.

Industry players cited several reasons why allocations were slashed. From the Financial Times:

“Big endowments and other high-profile investors that are trimming private equity target allocations, after years of increasing them, are doing so because of the difficulties they face trying to recycle two years’ worth of exceptional, record-high cash distributions from private equity,” said Antoine Dréan, chairman of Triago, a private equity adviser.

“Many investors feel there are not enough high-quality classic private equity funds currently raising money to permit them to easily reinvest that amount of cash without lowering the level of return they have come to expect from the asset class.”

Private equity managers are unlikely to be losing sleep over this pullback, however. Investors such as the Harvard Management Company said the retrenchment is a cyclical move prompted by the volume of “dry powder” rather than a loss of faith in the asset class. Dry powder, already committed capital yet to be put to work, is sitting at a record $1.2tn according to Preqin, the data provider.

According to the Commonfund report, private equity investments returned around 16 percent for endowments in 2014.

 

Photo by TaxRebate.org.uk via Flickr CC License

Canada Pensions Team With Spanish Bank to Create Sustainable Investment Company

2950975041_27c5d7c8e3_z

The Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, Canada’s Public Sector Pension Investment Board, and Spanish bank Banco Santander SA have combined forces and formed an investment company focused on renewable energy investments.

The firm, called Cubico Sustainable Investments, is backed by $2 billion in assets from the involved pension funds.

More on the partnership, from Bloomberg:

“Renewable and water infrastructure developments require decisive long-term investment and commitment,” said Chief Executive Officer Marcos Sebares, previously of Santander. “We’ve already built a strong pipeline of attractive assets.”

The aim is to double the size of Cubico within five years, targeting returns of at least 10 percent depending on the risk profile, geography and stage of project development, Sebares said in a conference call.

The $2 billion portfolio comprises 19 wind, solar and water facilities either operating or being built. Previously owned by Madrid-based Santander, the sites generate more than 1,400 megawatts and are in Brazil, Mexico, Uruguay, Italy, Portugal, Spain and the U.K. Company plans are to enter Peru and Colombia and to consider investments in offshore wind.

“With renewables technologies maturing, the sector is seeing increasing interest from institutional investors such as pension funds,” said Janis Hoberg, an analyst at Bloomberg New Energy Finance. “They may be particularly attracted by the yields offered by renewables projects in Europe thanks to current low interest rates and slowly diminishing policy risk.”

All three founding parties will hold equal ownership of the firm.

 

Photo by penagate via Flickr CC

Five Ways the Department of Labor Could Improve its Fiduciary Proposal

College_Math_Papers

Carol Buckmann is an attorney who has practiced in the employee benefits field for over 30 years. This post was originally published at Pensions & Benefits Law.

The U.S. Department of Labor last month released its long-awaited re-write of proposed changes to the rules determining who is a fiduciary under ERISA, and the different sides have rushed to respond by calling the proposal either a great step forward in consumer protection or likely to result in less or no advice to small plan fiduciaries and IRA owners.

While it is undeniable that the proposal would meaningfully expand the class of advisers who are fiduciaries, neither of these opposing  responses is likely to be true. Does anyone really believe that advisers will give up such a lucrative market?

The devil is in the details, and objective observers should conclude that it is too early to tell exactly how this complicated proposal will affect the advice market. But it is, in fact, a proposal, not a final rule, and public comments may bring about some needed clarifications and changes.  (A coalition has asked the DOL to extend the comment period to 120 days from the 75-day period in the proposal, but indications are that the DOL response will be negative.)

Here is my list of five steps the Department could take to improve the proposal:

  1. Start by clarifying and narrowing the activities which result in fiduciary status.  People should know when they assume personal liability. The elimination of the current requirements that investment advisers provide advice on a regular basis and that the advice must be individualized and given pursuant to an understanding that it will be a primary basis for plan decisions is a crucial step in extending broker and adviser accountability.  However, the proposal’s definition also sweeps in recommendations that are “specifically directed” to a plan or IRA, even if not individualized,  and it is not at all clear what that means.  Can I become a fiduciary simply because I know that I am speaking with a plan or IRA owner? This vague basis for fiduciary status should be eliminated from the definition, and the inclusion of those who issue appraisals and fairness opinions should be reconsidered.
  2. Provide a clear carve-out for the actuaries, lawyers and accountants who perform typical professional services in connection with investments.  For example,  benefits professionals are often asked by clients whether they are aware of good or bad experiences with particular managers or advisers or which managers or advisers their other clients might typically use.  Under the proposed rule, however, recommending which managers or advisers to hire constitutes “investment advice”.    The rule does not exempt them even though they are not paid any separate fee for such information, but are obviously being compensated generally for advising the client on other typical  plan administrative or legal issues.  It should be made clear that merely providing such information does not make you a fiduciary.
  3. Provide a carve-out for sophisticated IRA investors similar to the carve-out for large plan investors with financial expertise.  This could require a minimum IRA balance and some showing or self-certification of expertise.  While it may be true that many IRA investors are not financially savvy, the former CFO of a business doesn’t need special protections.
  4. Eliminate the “catch 22” for acknowledging fiduciary status.  We should be encouraging acknowledgements of fiduciary status, but under the proposal, anyone who calls herself a fiduciary, regardless of the functions actually performed, seems to be a fiduciary for all purposes and prohibited from taking advantage of any of the carve-outs.  Long-standing DOL authority holds that the same person may sometimes be acting in a fiduciary capacity and at other times may be a mere service provider.   Where appropriate, carve-outs should be available to those who acknowledge fiduciary status.
  5. Fix the “Best Interest” exemption.  This exemption is needed if advisers to IRAs and to fiduciaries of small plans are to receive varying commissions and receive other traditional compensation in the “retail” market, but it should have clear and reasonable conditions.  The proposal includes requirements that the adviser provide a warranty of: compliance with existing law and tell clients that they have a right to sue in class actions. This goes far beyond the DOL’s stated purpose in requiring advisers to put the client’s interest first.  This would also be the first “principles based” exemption, and, if retained, the DOL needs to flesh out what the requirements, such as having policies in place to eliminate conflicts of interest, actually mean.

Of course, many other comments can and will be made, but these are a starting point.

We have long understood the need to update 1975 regulations to reflect the current market, and a re-write of those regulations is long overdue.  But specialists everywhere are struggling to understand the details and how some of the complicated new rules are intended to work.  We hope that the DOL will keep the important concepts and conditions in the proposal, but eliminate overbroad provisions and complexity that  is extraneous to the proposal’s core purpose.

In Kentucky Gubernatorial Race, Little Mention of Pensions

kentucky

The race for Kentucky’s governorship is now underway, but the candidates – Republican Matt Bevin and Democrat Jack Conway – have so far barely touched on one of the state’s key issues: it’s underfunded pension system.

In fairness, it’s only been hours since Matt Bevin was announced as the victor in the GOP primary, and both campaigns are just beginning to ramp up.

But neither candidate has made pension funding a main issue of their campaign.

More on what the candidates have and have not said, from WDRB:

Matt Bevin, the presumptive Republican nominee after an apparent razor-thin primary win, offers more than Democrat Jack Conway does, but neither’s platform is proportional to the magnitude of this problem.

Conway told the Kentucky Chamber of Commerce that the most important thing we could do to address the pension crisis was to “grow our economy and create more good-paying jobs.” He also promises to work with both parties to make “the contributions called for by the actuary in order to get our pension system healthy again.”

Bevin pledges an outside audit, putting future state hires in a private sector-style 401(k) plan, and examining all options for moving existing employees into such plans. He also says, “All current employees should be required to make increased pension contributions in order to help secure their own pensions and make the system more financially sound.”

Simply stated, Conway offers next to nothing while Bevin offers more than he can deliver. Neither offers answers sufficient to actually address the problem.

The Kentucky Employee Retirement System’s Non-Hazardous Pension Plan is currently 22 percent funded.

 

Photo credit: “Ky With HP Background” by Original uploader was HiB2Bornot2B at en.wikipedia – Transferred from en.wikipedia; transfer was stated to be made by User:Vini 175.. Licensed under CC BY-SA 2.5 via Wikimedia Commons

Australia’s Largest Pension Looks to Boost Direct Investing; Part of Bid to Bring Management Duties In-House

583px-Australia_satellite_plane

AustralianSuper, the county’s largest pension fund, is looking to manage 40 percent of its assets in-house by 2018 (currently, that number sits at around 20 percent).

As part of that process, the fund is pushing for more direct investing – specifically, the fund wants to begin buying shares from companies before they go public.

From Bloomberg:

AustralianSuper Pty wants to lend to companies and invest directly in their shares before initial public offerings as it seeks to deploy the growing reserves of the country’s largest pension fund.

It sees the potential for more such transactions as it expands its in-house investment team, head of equities Innes McKeand said in an interview Wednesday.

“Australian corporates should pick up the phone to us,” McKeand said. “We see a lot more potential for that sort of investment and we believe we can push that area a lot further,” he said, referring to pre-placement share acquisitions.

Direct transactions, such as buying shares before a firm goes public, will allow the pension fund to pick up sizable stakes without inflating the target’s stock price, he said. AustralianSuper, which has almost doubled its funds under management in three years, also wants to lend to companies, pitting it directly with banks.

[…]

“We are in the early stages of direct investment, writing big checks in the equity space, and we have had great results early on with some relatively low-risk transactions,” McKeand said.

AustralianSuper manages $70 billion in assets.

$500 Million Settlement Approved in Suit Between Pensions, JP Morgan

13139691324_b3494430ed_z

A federal judge has approved a $500 million settlement in a lawsuit, led by a handful of pension funds, that accused JP Morgan of knowingly selling toxic securities to investors.

The lawsuit actually stems from securities issued by Bear Sterns; but Sterns was acquired by JP Morgan in 2008.

More details from Bloomberg:

The settlement will be allocated among a group of pension funds, led by the Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi and the New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund, as well as Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and the State of Oregon.

According to the pension funds, offering documents shown to investors contained false and misleading statements about the securities, holding them out as the highest quality and with low risk.

“As a result of the untrue statements and omissions, plaintiffs and the class purchased certificates that were far riskier than represented, not of the ‘best quality’ and not equivalent to other investments with the same credit ratings,” the group said in its complaint.

The case covered 22 offerings constructed from over 64,000 underlying mortgage loans from almost 500 originators, according to court documents.

The $500 million settlement was reached late in 2014, but only approved this week.

 

Photo by Sarath Kuchi via Flickr CC License

San Bernardino Exit Plan Cuts Some Pension Costs

san bern

Reporter Ed Mendel covered the Capitol in Sacramento for nearly three decades, most recently for the San Diego Union-Tribune. Find more of his stories at Calpensions.com.

A San Bernardino plan to exit bankruptcy follows the path of the Vallejo and Stockton exit plans, cutting bond debt and retiree health care but not pensions. Then it veers off in a new direction: contracting for fire, waste management and other services.

The contract services are expected to reduce city pension costs. Other pension savings come from a sharp increase in employee payments toward pensions and from a payment of only 1 percent on a $50 million bond issued in 2005 to cover pensions costs.

Last week, a member of the city council had a question as a long-delayed “plan of adjustment” to exit the bankruptcy, declared in August 2012, was approved on a 6-to-1 vote, meeting a May 30 deadline imposed by a federal judge.

“The justification from what I’m understanding from the plan — the justification for contracting is more or less to save the city from the pension obligation. Is that correct?” said Councilman Henry Nickel.

One of the slides outlining the summary of the recovery plan said: “CalPERS costs continue to escalate, making in-house service provision for certain functions unsustainable.”

The city manager, Allen Parker, told Nickel “that’s part of it” but not the “entirety.”

In addition to pension savings, he said, contracting with a private firm for refuse collection now handled through a special fund is expected to yield a “$5 million payment up front” into the deficit-ridden city general fund.

Parker said the California Public Employees Retirement System safety rate for firefighters is between 45 and 55 percent of base pay. “So if you have a fireman making say $100,000 a year, there is another $50,000 a year that goes to CalPERS,” he said.

An actuary estimated that contracting for fire services could save the city $2 million a year in pension costs, Parker said. The city expects total savings of $7 million or more a year, similar to a Santa Ana contract with the Orange County Fire Authority.

Unlike other unions, firefighters have not voluntarily agreed to help the struggling city by taking a 10 percent pay cut and foregoing merit increases. The cost of firefighter overtime has averaged $6.5 million in recent years.

After the court allowed the city to overturn a firefighter contract requiring “constant manning” last year, the city expected reduced staffing during off-hours. But overtime has not decreased, wiping out anticipated savings of $2.5 million this year.

Negotiations with the firefighters are difficult, Parker said, and their union has filed several lawsuits. He said the situation is “out of hand” and “can’t be contained,” part of the reason for the plan to contract for fire services.

The city expects fire service bids from San Bernardino County and others. A private firm, Centerra, has shown interest. Councilman Nickel said a legislator called about contracting with a private firm, suggesting “concern at the state level.”

Parker said a contract with a private firm would need a mutual aid agreement with neighboring government fire services. He said a San Manuel private fire service has been accepted by a fire chiefs association that manages the regional agreements.

Contracting for police services is not planned. Parker said the “one possible agency,” the San Bernardino County Sheriff‘s Department, made a $60 million proposal in 2012, reaffirmed last year, that would not yield city savings.

Fire and waste management are the biggest opportunities for savings and revenue among 15 options for contracting city services listed in the recovery plan summary. City employees are expected to be rehired by contractors.

Estimated annual savings are listed for contracting five other services: business licenses $650,000 to $900,000, fleet maintenance $400,000, soccer complex management $240,000 to $320,000, custodial $150,000, and graffiti abatement $132,600.

San Bernardino plan to return to solvency

In the 1960s, San Bernardino was the “epitome of middle-class living,” said the plan summary, and then a “profound and continuous decline” turned it into the poorest California city of its size (214,000).

Median San Bernardino household income was at the California average in 1969, an inflation-adjusted $54,999, before steadily falling by 2013 to $38,385, well below the state average of $61,094.

Financial trouble began before the recession. A unique form of government created “crippling ambiguities” of authority among the city manager, mayor, council and elected city attorney, leaving no one clearly in charge as the city slowly sank.

When the reckoning finally came in 2012, San Bernardino faced an $18 million cash shortfall and an inability to make payroll. After an emergency bankruptcy filing, the city became the first to skip its annual payments to CalPERS.

Now the skipped payment of $14.5 million is being repaid over two fiscal years with equal installments of about $7.2 million. The recovery plan also said with no elaboration: “FY 2019-20: $400,000 annually in penalties and interest.”

Replying to Nickel last week, the city manager explained why, if most employees are to be replaced by contract services, the plan does not propose to cut CalPERS debt. The city’s pensions have an “unfunded liability” of $285 million and are 74 percent funded.

Parker said the plan protects pension amounts already earned by city employees, even with a new employer, and like the Stockton and Vallejo plans reflects the view that pensions are needed to compete with other government employers in the job market.

“We naively thought we could negotiate more successfully, but that didn’t necessarily happen,” Parker said of mediation with CalPERS. An early plan called for a “fresh start” stretching out pension payments, yielding small savings in the first years.

And like Vallejo but not Stockton, which said from the outset it did not want to cut pensions, Parker said there was fear of a costly and lengthy legal battle with deep-pocketed CalPERS, possibly all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

One of the unique provisions in the San Bernardino city charter, which voters declined to overturn last year, bases police and firefighter pay on the average safety pay in 10 other cities, not labor bargaining.

Despite that link, police and firefighter compensation is said to be 8 to 10 percent below market because of low benefits. The bankrupt city stopped paying the employee CalPERS share and raised police and firefighters rates to 14 percent of pay.

Higher pension contributions from employees saved the city about $8 million last fiscal year, the plan said. Retiree health payments were reduced from a maximum of $450 per month to $112 per month, saving $213,750 last year.

“The filing of the plan is only the beginning of a long and very difficult process regarding confirmation and continued litigation with some of our creditors,” the city attorney, Gary Saenz, told the city council last week.

Berdoo

 

Photo by  Pete Zarria via Flickr CC License


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /home/mhuddelson/public_html/pension360.org/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 3712