What Does the Puerto Rico Rescue Mean For U.S. Pensioners?

Sitting in the U.S. Senate is a Puerto Rico rescue bill that would allow the territory to restructure its debts, and to cease making payments to its bondholders for now.

Details are still vague; but if the bill passes, does it mean anything for pensioners living in distressed states like Illinois?

Ike Brannon of the Cato Institute, writing in the Hill, thinks it might:

Right now, states cannot declare bankruptcy, which is one reason why states have traditionally been able to borrow at such low rates of interest. However, financial markets have come to realize, belatedly, that Illinois (along with other states) is making promises to its lenders that it will have trouble keeping.

Puerto Rico was not supposed to be eligible for bankruptcy either, but the legislation before Congress will allow the territory to reduce its debt, both general-obligation and non-general-obligation debt.

[…]

If the bill does become law, the island will promptly cease making payments to its bondholders for the indefinite future: The proposed 2017 Puerto Rican budget — which assumes as much — sets aside no money to pay general obligation bondholders. Since the legislation also stays creditor lawsuits, the island can proceed to use the funds freed up by stiffing the creditors to hire more workers, build infrastructure and put money into its nearly bankrupt pension fund.

Any money that does gets stashed in the pension fund will be well-nigh impossible to disgorge when the stay is lifted. The Puerto Rican government can pull out its pockets and plead poverty and any creditor that lost money during the stay will likely be out of luck.

This is the blueprint Illinois will almost surely follow. It will request that Congress extend it some sort of bankruptcy protection and it will present Congress with a facile choice: Does it want to protect the evil vulture funds from Wall Street that lent it money or the hardworking state employees who just want the pension promised to them? Congress may want to pretend otherwise, but the current legislation before it favors one set of pensioners ahead of other pensioners whose money happens to be invested in Puerto Rican debt.

Read the full piece here.

Canadian Pensions Make $1.35 Billion Entry Into Mexico’s Infrastructure

The Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, along with the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB), are making a $1.35 billion bet on Latin American infrastructure.

The two pension funds are partnering with an infrastructure development company to acquire a 49 percent stake in one of Mexico’s largest toll roads.

More from the Financial Post:

CPPIB and Teachers are kicking in a combined $1.35 billion to the partnership to acquire a 49 per cent stake in a new company formed by the partners to house one of the largest toll road concessions in Mexico, the group said Thursday.

[…]

The toll road is CPPIB’s first infrastructure investment in Mexico, but there are others in South America including two in Chile, and a gas pipeline in Peru.

Hogg said the infrastructure team in CPPIB’s Brazil office, opened in Sao Paolo in 2014, played an integral role in the Mexican toll road transaction.

“Members of our Sao Paolo office were heavily involved in this deal and bringing it to a successful conclusion,” she said.

Arco Norte is one of the largest federal toll road concessions in Mexico, with more than 30 years remaining on the concession. The 233-kilometre toll road bypass surrounds Mexico City in the north, northeast, and northwest region, “providing a critical link with major trade corridors,” according to the news release.

NJ Supreme Court Ruling Won’t Affect Illinois Pensions: Expert

This week, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that the state acted legally when it suspended pension cost-of-living-adjustments in 2011 because state employees had no contractual right to those increases.

Over at CapitolFax.com, Eric Madiar – former Chief Legal Counsel to Illinois Senate President John J. Cullerton, now a lobbyist and consultant – weighed in on whether the ruling would affect Illinois.

His thoughts:

Here’s Eric’s summary:

The New Jersey court held that because of the New Jersey Constitution the legislature lacked the power to create a binding contractually enforceable pension right. The creation of such a right was tantamount to taking on state debt in violation of the state constitution. The court stated that the legislature can only take on state debt and commit itself to the needed appropriations to fund that debt with voter approval. Since that did not occur when the pension right was passed, it was not a binding promise when the legislature enacted it.

Eric re-read the opinion this morning and offers this addendum noting that the New Jersey court looked at what the Illinois court had done and drew a distinction between the two constitutions.

The New Jersey Supreme Court held that COLAs are not protected pension benefits and are distinct from the pension annuity that a retiree is entitled to receive under New Jersey pension law. The New Jersey court focused on the lack of clear and unmistakable statutory language conferring COLA increases as a protected pension benefit. This is unlike what occurred in Illinois where the Illinois Supreme Court found that COLAs are part of the protected benefits that cannot be unilaterally changed. Indeed, in footnote 7 of the decision, the New Jersey Supreme Court notes how the statutory system regarding COLAs in Illinois is different from New Jersey.

NY Prison Pension Chief, Hedge Fund Manager Booked for Fraud

The president of New York’s correctional officers union was arrested on Wednesday for steering pension money into a hedge fund in exchange for a percentage of the profit – all while circumventing the other trustees.

His partner in crime, a Platinum Partners hedge fund manager, was also arrested.

More from ai-cio.com:

Seabrook controlled an $81 million member retirement fund, according to the complaint. Despite board opposition, Seabrook allegedly signed over $20 million to Platinum in exchange for a 2% profit share—roughly $100,00 to $150,000 per year.

He is accused of receiving one payment in a luxury bag, along with extensive free travel.

“For a Ferragamo bag stuffed with $60,000 in cash, Seabrook allegedly sold himself and his duty to safeguard the retirement funds of his fellow correction officers,” said Manhattan US Attorney Preet Bharara at a press conference Wednesday.

[…]

Platinum reportedly specializes in assets others won’t touch: Payday loans, insurance products targeting the terminally ill, oil companies facing criminal charges, and—twice—Ponzi schemes.

The strategy has delivered substantial alpha for years, according to figures obtained by Reuters. One of Platinum’s two funds returned an average 17% annually since 2003, and the flagship 13.4% since 2005.

Platinum co-founder Murray Huberfeld offered Seabrook additional payouts if he could lead fellow institutions into the fund, the complaint stated.

Federal agents arrested Huberfeld at his home Wednesday.

Both men face up to 40 years in prison on fraud charges, the Department of Justice said.

NJ Supreme Court: No Contractual Right to COLAs

The New Jersey Supreme Court on Thursday sided with Chris Christie and ruled that state employees had no contractual right to cost-of-living adjustments.

Christie in 2011 signed a law that froze pension COLAs for state workers, prompting a lawsuit that ended today.

From Bloomberg:

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and the Legislature acted legally in suspending cost-of-living adjustments for retired public workers, the state Supreme Court ruled in a case that might have cost taxpayers billions of dollars.

Christie and lawmakers halted COLA payments in 2011 as part of a pension bill that forced hundreds of thousands of employees to pay more into the underfunded system and raised their retirement age.

[…]

A group of 26 retired attorneys sued over the COLA suspension, arguing they had a contractual and constitutional right to pension payments and increases pegged to the Consumer Price Index. They cited a 1997 law that established “certain non-forfeitable” contractual rights to a “benefits program” that would not be reduced.

[…]

The state is one of many grappling with underfunded pensions. At the end of 2015, state and local government retirement systems had $1.7 trillion less than they will eventually need, up from a $293 billion shortfall eight years earlier, according to Federal Reserve Board figures. New Jersey confronts an $83 billion pension liability that is growing and has led to a record nine credit-rating downgrades since Christie took office.

The Court’s rulings in the last 12 months have not been kind of public workers. Last June, the same court ruled that Christie acted legally when he skipped $1.6 billion worth of pension contributions in defiance of the 2011 law requiring him to make those payments.

 

Photo by Bob Jagendorf from Manalapan, NJ, USA (NJ Governor Chris Christie) [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Outgoing CPPIB Chief Responds to Criticism of Investment Strategy

Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) CEO Mark Wiseman is leaving his post next week. But he’s using his remaining time to defend his fund’s active investment strategy.

Wiseman and incoming CEO Mark Machin wrote a column in a major Canadian newspaper on Monday defending the fund’s active investment strategy.

Ai-cio.com has the highlights:

“We can say with confidence that our strategy is adding value,” Wiseman and Machin wrote.

Through active management, the incoming and outgoing CEOs said CPPIB has been able to capitalize on structural advantages including its long-term horizon, stable and predictable flow of contributions, and size. Additionally, they said active management has made it possible for CPPIB to address risks such as climate change.

“To ignore these advantages would be the sporting equivalent of benching Sidney Crosby, Connor McDavid, and Steven Stamkos for an Olympic gold-medal hockey game,” they wrote.

While critics have attacked the fund’s increasing costs, Wiseman and Machin argued that these costs need to be examined in the context of the additional long-term returns the fund has generated.

“Active management requires more resources, and therefore more expenses, than a passive strategy,” they concluded. “But we firmly believe that it generates significantly higher risk-adjusted returns.”

Read the column here.

 

NJ Republicans, Democrats Offer Dueling Pension Proposals

On Monday, a NJ Assembly committee advanced a Democrat-backed proposal that would amend the state constitutional to lock in iron-clad, full, quarterly pension payments from the state.

Now, Republicans have offered up their own proposal – or rather, revived a plan initially proposed last year.

Their version would also amend the constitution to require annual contributions from the state. But it would pay for the measure by requiring workers to pay more of their health care costs.

From NJ.com:

Assemblyman Declan O’Scanlon’s legislation, introduced Monday, revives a dormant plan proposed by the governor’s special pension commission last year to overhaul public employees’ benefits and save their employers billions of dollars a year.

While it would require workers to pick up more of the cost for their heath care, they would be rewarded with a constitutional amendment obligating the state to contribute to the public pension system annually — unless tax collections are in trouble.

O’Scanlon (R-Monmouth) unveiled the sweeping legislation Tuesday, just one day after an Assembly committee voted in favor of a Democratic plan to grant workers that constitutional protection.

[…]

Broadly, active employees would be moved onto health care plans equivalent to gold plans under the Affordable Care Act, and retirees would be given retiree reimbursement accounts to cover the cost of purchasing coverage through a private exchange.

Active employees would pay lower annual premiums, because the total cost of the plan is lower, but higher out-of-pocket expenses.

Mass. Pension Chief Resigns Days After Records Ruled Public

The head of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) pension fund on Monday revealed he’d be stepping down in August.

His fund has been at the center of controversy because, until recently, it was not subject to FOIA laws and does not hold open meetings. It has also had its accounting questioned.

Mass. Governor Charlie Baker signed a bill last month changing that. Additionally, a judge in March ruled that records should be public.

More from the Boston Globe:

A former bus driver who served as general manager of the transit authority before moving to the $1.5 billion pension fund, [Michael H.] Mulhern said he was leaving with “decidedly mixed emotions” after a decade in the job.

Mulhern, 57, has been under pressure from union and administration officials over the pension’s lack of transparency, after a $25 million hedge fund loss in 2012 went undisclosed for more than a year.

The pension fund for employees at the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority is organized as a private trust and has used that status to avoid disclosures that are typical of other pension funds for public workers in the state. The fund does not hold open meetings, for example, and for years has published late and incomplete annual reports.

[…]

There are other potential issues lurking in the projections, critics say, including the valuation of alternative assets such as hedge funds and private equity that the FTI report did not fully examine.

In addition, the fund disclosed in a recent audit that it assumes 100 percent of its employees are men, while, in reality, one-quarter are women.

NJ Pension Amendment Moves Forward

A proposed constitutional amendment, which would require New Jersey to make full, quarterly contributions to its pension funds, passed a state Assembly committee on Monday by a 5-2 vote.

State Democrats, who have been championing the amendment for years, are pushing for placement on the November ballot.

More from Nj.com:

An identical resolution was passed by the Legislature last year and must pass again this year in order to qualify for the fall election, which is expected to see high turnout from the presidential race.

The measure (ACR109) was approved by a 5-2 vote along party lines, with Republicans expressing concerns that the mandatory payments could lead to steep tax increases.

[…]

Without the amendment, the size of the state’s payment — or whether the state makes one at all — is at the discretion of the governor and the Legislature. That’s part of the reason the state’s portion of the pension system is only about 48.6 percent funded.

The amendment also would force the state to make the contribution into the retirement fund in installments throughout the year. State Senate President Stephen Sweeney (D-Gloucester) has said waiting until the end of the year costs the state millions of dollars in investment earnings.

CalPERS Ex-CEO Sentenced, But Probe Continues

Reporter Ed Mendel covered the California Capitol in Sacramento for nearly three decades, most recently for the San Diego Union-Tribune. More stories are at Calpensions.com.

A former CalPERS chief executive officer, Fred Buenrostro, was sentenced to 4½ years in prison last week for taking bribes, including $200,000 in cash, from a former CalPERS board member, Alfred Villalobos, who collected about $50 million in fees from private equity firms for helping them get investments from the big pension fund.

Villalobos died from a pistol shot to the head at a Reno gun range in January last year, an apparent suicide on the day before a scheduled court appearance. His inside man at CalPERS, Buenrostro, pleaded guilty on the eve of his trial in July 2014 and has been cooperating since then with state and federal prosecutors.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Timothy Lucey told a federal court in San Francisco last week that Buenrostro, after his guilty plea, went on “to assist the government in a number of ongoing investigations the court is aware of through the filings that have been made to the court, both the public filings and the sealed filings.”

Buenrostro’s attorney, William Portanova, told the court that his client “took the investigation to a level far beyond that which his own case involved” and that information in the sentencing memorandum and sealed documents “touches on some of these larger investigations.”

U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer noted that Buenrostro’s cooperation resulted in refiled charges before his guilty plea that reduced the maximum sentence from ten years to five years. He disagreed with Lucey and Portanova that cooperation since then merited an additional one-year reduction, instead cutting six months for a total of 4½ years.

Breyer, quoting Lucey, said Buenrostro committed “a spectacular breach of trust for the most venal of purposes, which is self enrichment.” Buenrostro had years to turn back but chose to “double down,” said the judge, calling it “a dagger in the heart of public trust, and without public trust our government institutions cannot function.”

Buenrostro
Buenrostro, 66, balding head slightly bowed, shuffled into court in faded blue pajama-style prison garb, with day-glow orange footwear and his legs apparently shackled together by a short chain not visible from the back of the court room.

“Your honor, I take full responsibility and accept the consequences of the actions I took,” Buenrostro said in a firm and clear voice. “I’m humiliated, embarrassed, and deeply ashamed of my actions.”

Asking mercy, Buenrostro said he “let down” family and friends and apologized to CalPERS, the court, prosecutors, and his fellow Californians. He said he assisted the U.S. Attorney, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the state Attorney General “in their investigation and litigation and will continue to render assistance.”

So, what’s still being investigated? There were few public clues last week.

A sentencing memorandum filed by Lucey outlined the case against Buenrostro, adding some new detail but no major surprises to an extensive report in 2011 done for CalPERS at a cost of $11 million by Philip Khinda of a Washington, D.C., law firm.

Buenrostro, a former CalPERS board member, served as chief executive officer from December 2002 to May 2008. His earliest connection with a Villalobos deal mentioned in the Lucey and Khinda reports began with meetings in 2004 at the Villalobos home at Lake Tahoe.

Notably, three active CalPERS board members (Robert Carlson, Charles Valdes, and Kurato Shimada) met with Villalobos and Buenrostro (who had served on the board with the other three a decade earlier) and an executive of a firm, Medco, that was seeking a large CalPERS pharmacy contract, said the Khinda report.

Carlson and Valdes, now both deceased, voted in 2005 to give Medco the pharmacy contract. Shimada, though not a committee member, sat in and asked that his questions be reflected in the record. Villalobos reportedly got the final $1 million of a $4 million fee immediately after the vote.

“Early in the conspiracy,” said the Lucey report, “Villalobos used Buenrostro’s mere presence to add luster and gravitas to important meetings with his clients, knowing that Buenrostro would place his interests over his duty to CalPERS.”

Outside CalPERS, Villalobos was beginning to attract attention. In 2006 Los Angeles Times reporters asked the California Public Employees Retirement System for letters, e-mails or memos from Villalobos and former state Sen. Richard Polanco about investment opportunities.

A letter to the Times from a CalPERS attorney rejecting the Public Records Act request said “the release of the (sic) some of the requested information may harm CalPERS’ ability to continue to invest with top-tier private equity funds.”

Inside CalPERS, a staff proposal in 2007 requiring investment managers to disclose the use of “placement agents” such as Villalobos stalled in a committee chaired by Shimada, who had worked for Villalobos during a three-year absence from the CalPERS board beginning in 1999.

The California State Teachers Retirement System was adopting placement agent rules at the time. And crucially, as it turned out, in March 2007 a large private equity firm, Apollo, began requiring a written acknowledgement from investors like CalPERS before paying fees to placement agents like Villalobos.

When CalPERS investment and legal staff refused to give Villalobos an acknowledgement, he had Buenrostro sign a series of acknowledgements on phony CalPERS letterhead that became a key part of the charges against the two men.

Villalobos hosted Buenrostro’s wedding at Tahoe in 2004, promised (and later delivered) lucrative post-CalPERS employment, and betstowed other gifts. The notorious cash payments came as Buenrostro needed money for a divorce and Villalobos pursued the Apollo deal, said the Lucey report.

By December 2007, Villalobos had made cash payments to Buenrostro at the Hyatt hotel near the Capitol in Sacramento on three separate occasions: “The first two payments of $50,000 were each delivered in a paper bag, while the last installment of $100,000 was delivered in a shoebox.”

After receiving the last of the phony disclosure letters in June 2008, said the Lucey report, Apollo began payments to the Villalobos firm, ARVCO, that totaled more than $14 million before they were stopped on their way to as much as $35 million over the life of the contracts.

Excerpt from U.S. Attorneys' sentencing memorandum

Buenrostro retired June 30, 2008, after his official duties ended on May 12 of that year amid staff complaints of “unprecedented levels of meddling in investment decisions.” Shimada resigned from the CalPERS board in April 2010.

The Khinda report concluded that the CalPERS investment staff “did withstand” the pressure from Buenrostro and did not make inappropriate investments. A CalPERS new release last week listed the reforms resulting from the scandal, including the disclosure of placement agents.

A mark of the passage of time, and CalPERS hopes the healing of wounds, since its survey of private equity firms in 2009 revealed the huge Villalobos fees: Buenrostro’s successor, the current CalPERS chief executive officer, Anne Stausboll, is retiring at the end of the month.

Buenrostro settled a state lawsuit by agreeing to pay a $250,000 fine, which if not paid will be reapplied by the federal ruling. He also agreed to a judgment in an SEC case and to accept a penalty, if one is imposed after the federal ruling.

His annual CalPERS pension, $201,600 based on a final salary of $238,992 and about three decades of service, was reduced to $141,278 under a “felony forfeiture” provision and a $360,000 overpayment will be deducted, the Sacramento Bee reported.

Nineteen letters in support of leniency for Buenrostro were sent to the judge by several of his Pepperdine classmates, ski instructor colleagues, family, two persons well-known at the Capitol, and the nonprofit Shores of Hope, which praised his post-guilty plea work on transportation management for the elderly and disabled.

One leniency letter dated in March was from a woman who said she had recently lived with Buenrostro for nearly three years. Buenrostro came to court in custody last week after being jailed in late April for misdemeanor battery on a former girlfriend, his second arrest.

Leniency was not urged in a letter to the judge from the CalPERS general counsel, Matthew Jacobs, that said Buenrostro “must be fittingly punished for this tremendous breach of the public trust” that led to an 18-month internal investigation and the Khinda report.

“CalPERS condemns Mr. Buenrostro’s misconduct in the strongest possible terms, and urges the court to hold him accountable for his actions,” Jacobs said. “Those actions eroded the trust that had been built up over 80 years between CalPERS and its members, employers, and stakeholders. It also had a tremendous impact on staff morale, and on CalPERS’s previously-strong reputation in the financial community.”


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /home/mhuddelson/public_html/pension360.org/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 3712