Congress Unveils Deal to Overhaul Military Retirement System

military

Pension360 has covered the months-long debate over how to overhaul the U.S. military retirement system.

Now, Congress has unveiled a bill to act on Pentagon-endorsed recommendations made last year that include shifting new service members into a 401(k)-style plan and restructuring the retirement system so that more soldiers receive benefits.

Details from Government Executive:

Under the proposal, modeled after recommendations made by the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission earlier this year, new troops would automatically be enrolled in the Thrift Savings Plan and receive a matching contribution from the government. Service members who stay in the military for 20 years, and are thereby entitled to a retirement pension, would receive a less generous calculation for their annuity.

The bill attempts to move away from the 20-year, all-or-nothing pension system currently in place for military members. Only about 17 percent of troops serve for 20 years and become eligible for the benefit. To encourage members to stay in the military, they would receive “continuation pay” after 12 years of service.

The new blended retirement system would only affect new service members. Current service members are grandfathered into the current system, but could opt into the new one. The legislation also calls for a program to educate troops about the modified retirement system.

The overhaul still needs to pass both chambers of Congress and be approved by the President.

 

Photo by Brian Schlumbohm/Fort Wainwright PAO via Flickr CC License

San Diego Mayor Proposes Pension Reserve Fund

7408447448_8de1f6190e_z

San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer on Tuesday called for the creation of a pension reserve fund, for the purpose of storing extra cash now to ensure the city’s ability to make full pension contributions in the future.

Faulconer wants to put $21 million in the reserve fund right away – which, at first glance, pales in comparison to the city’s estimated $248 million pension contribution due next year.

But the reserve fund would be designed only to guard against unexpected swings in annual payment amounts, due to investment losses or other problems.

More from the San Diego Union-Tribune:

“This is a policy that guards against fluctuations,” said Faulconer, stressing that the city’s annual pension payment jumped $75 million — from $154 million to $229 million — after the stock market crash of 2008.

Making that larger payment forced the city to cut from other areas back then, including libraries, parks, firefighters and police officers.

“We’ve seen what wild swings can do,” Faulconer said.

Faulconer said creating the reserve is becoming particularly important with the stock market’s recent downturn, because investment losses for the city’s pension fund typically force an increase in its annual pension payment.

[…]

The $21 million proposed for the fund would be equal to 8 percent of the city’s average annual pension payment over the last three years, which was $264.4 million.

More than $16.3 million would come from the general fund, with the remainder coming from other funds such as sewer and water because many employees with pensions work in those areas.

Mary Lewis, the city’s chief financial officer, said the city’s annual payment was scheduled to drop from $254 million in the current fiscal year to $248 million in the fiscal that begins next July. But she said investment losses and other problems seem likely to increase that about $12 million or more.

The City Council will debate the proposal late next week.

 

Photo by TaxCredits.net

Ontario Teachers’ Eyes London Expansion?

6451642447_4356164259_z

Leo Kolivakis is a blogger, trader and independent senior pension and investment analyst. This post was originally published at Pension Pulse.

Joseph Cotterill of the Financial Times reports, Ontario Teachers’ eyes London expansion:

Ontario Teachers’, the Canadian pension plan that owns the UK’s High Speed One railway and its National Lottery operator, is planning to expand further in London, tripling the size of its European investment team.

It revealed on Thursday that it aimed to grow its private equity arm by adding staff in infrastructure and in what it calls “relationship investing” — investing in public or nearly-public companies and working closely with the managers.

Teachers’, which has $160bn in assets, this month moved from Leconsfield House, MI5’s former haunt, into a bigger steel-and-glass building overlooking Marylebone’s leafy Portman Square.

Its expansion is expected to lead to further purchases in the UK, where it also owns Birmingham and Bristol airports.

“We own four airports, so why wouldn’t we look at London City Airport?,” says Jo Taylor, Teachers’ European head, highlighting one asset that is coming to the market. (Teachers also owns Brussels and Copenhagen airports.)

“If an asset like London City became available, or an asset like HS2 [HS1’s potential successor] became available for funding, clearly we would be interested,” he adds.

Ontario Teachers’ is one of a rare breed of pension fund investors — many of them Canadian — that are using in-house teams to find and buy assets independently, or alongside buyout firms, as well as paying fees to traditional third-party funds.

They are increasingly seen by some buyout managers as rivals in a market where prices are high and deals scarce.

“They’re the poster boy, the role model if you like, for increasingly active investors in private equity,” says Stephen Gillespie, a partner at Gibson Dunn.

Mr Taylor, a veteran of 3i, the British buyout firm, prefers to talk about partnership.

Expanding in London, in a timezone where the fund can quickly give feedback on investment offers, provides “the ability for us to develop strategic relationships for the plan over the long term”, he says. “Teachers’ is very much focused on partnering.”

Last year it invested in CSC, a coin-operated laundry machine company owned by Pamplona Capital Management. Last week it continued the relationship, buying a stake in Pamplona’s OGF, France’s biggest operator of funeral parlours.

The nature of these businesses — unglamorous, but with inflation-busting cash flows — is not the private equity norm.

Part of the reason Teachers’ has become a large investor in infrastructure — typically a long-term investment — is that its private market returns have to protect future payouts to its more than 300,000 pension members. Public-sector pension plans must be fully-funded under Canadian law. (LK: this is false, only true in the Netherlands)

Ron Mock, chief executive, says the UK is the “model that the rest of the world follows” on infrastructure investment policy.

“It’s about clarity of outcome, it’s the regulatory environment,” he adds. “There’s not a lot of, or hardly any, renegotiation after a deal is done.”

But in both infrastructure and private equity, asset prices are high, as capital is flooding into what are inherently scarce assets from low-yielding public markets.

In buyouts, some question whether Teachers’ edge is simply overpaying and reducing its future returns.

Teachers’ view is that it takes a different perspective to traditional private equity firms by holding investments for the longer term.

Private equity firms can often own businesses for half a decade or more — but the limited lives of funds means they have to sell within a set period.

The nature of leverage, used to juice returns, can also make funds unwilling to inject more capital after the first investment.

“We can provide multiple subsequent rounds of capital,” Mr Taylor says. “We can hold an asset for seven, 10, 12 years . . . we look at these projects with a conservative approach. We’re more likely to apply lower levels of debt.”

In terms of Teachers’ returns, Mr Taylor says the fund has a 24-year record in private equity of 20 per cent net returns.

There is some academic evidence to back this up. In 2014 a Harvard Business School paper found ‘solo’ direct investments in private equity by seven anonymous large institutional investors returned more than public markets between 1991 and 2011.

Although these deals fared better than co-investing in companies alongside private equity managers, their outperformance versus investing in buyout funds was more mixed.

“While direct investments consistently outperform the market, they do not regularly outperform other private equity investments,” the paper argued.

This is an excellent article but let me go through some of my thoughts. First, unlike the Netherlands, there are no laws forcing public sector pension plans in Canada to be fully-funded. It’s too bad because I think everyone should be going Dutch on pensions, including our much touted Canadian funds which are global trendsetters.

Second, I have mixed feelings about Canadian pension funds opening up offices in London, New York, Hong Kong or elsewhere. On the one hand, I understand why they need “boots on the ground” but is it really necessary, especially if they have solid partners in these regions to work with? I’m not convinced about opening up foreign offices and paying people a lot of money for a job that can be done by pension fund professionals in Canada working with solid partners (here I prefer PSP’s approach than CPPIB’s and Teachers’). But if it works and helps reduce fees, maybe there is a rationale for such an approach.

Third, while direct investments in private equity do not regularly outperform other private equity investments, more and more private and public companies are looking for a long-term partner like Ontario Teachers’ when it comes to improving their operations. Even private equity funds are thinking long-term these days, emulating Buffett’s approach.

But don’t kid yourself. Mark Wiseman, president and CEO of CPPIB, told me a few years back that Canada’s pension fund invests and co-invests with top private equity funds because he “can’t afford to hire a David Bonderman.” However, in infrastructure, he told me CPPIB goes direct like most of Canada’s large pension funds.

Fourth, Ron Mock, the president and CEO of Ontario Teachers’, sounded the alarm on alternatives in late April. He knows the current environment is extremely difficult for liquid and illiquid investments but he and his team are always on the hunt for reasonably priced prize assets, especially in infrastructure.

In fact, Ron clearly explained OTPP’s asset-liability approach to investing when we chatted about the plan’s exceptional 2014 results. Everything at Teachers’ is about matching assets to liabilities. So, when I read that Teachers’ recently bought a stake in a French funeral business, I wasn’t surprised. These type of businesses aren’t glamorous but they provide steady cash flows over a long period, just like infrastructure.

Let me end this comment by plugging a firm in Toronto, Caledon Capital Management. I recently met three partners — David Rogers, Stephen Dowd and Jean Potter — here in Montreal and was thoroughly impressed with their approach in helping small and medium sized pension plans and family offices gain a foothold in infrastructure and private equity.

Prior to founding Caledon, David was the SVP at OMERS’ Private Equity and Stephen was the SVP, Infrastructure and Timberland, at Ontario Teachers’ before he joined Caledon last year. Together, they have years of experience working at public pensions which gives them an advantage when they assist their clients on board investment committees, helping them invest in these alternative asset classes.

[Footnote: David Rogers is one of the nicest guys I ever met in the pension fund industry and he helped Derek Murphy, PSP’s former SVP of Private Equity, and I a lot when we prepared the board presentation on private equity back in 2004. Derek, if you’re reading this, contact David at drogers@caledoncapital.com.

Also worth noting that Guthrie Stewart joined PSP Investments in September 2015 as Senior Vice President, Global Head of Private Investments. He will be replacing Derek Murphy in this new role and you can read about him here.]

As always, please remember to subscribe and/ or donate to PensionPulse via PayPal at the top right-hand side and support my efforts in bringing you the very best insights on pensions and investments. I thank all of my institutional supporters who value the work I provide them with.

 

Photo by  @Doug88888 via Flickr CC License

Illinois’ Pension Systems – Visualized

Over the last few months, Pension360 has collected and analyzed the pension records of about 440,000 annuitants in the largest pension systems in Illinois and Chicago.

We used the data to create a visual “snapshot” of each system — a way to see benefit payouts in a different, simple light.

The resulting heat maps, which can be seen below, visualize how benefits are distributed amongst the state’s pensioners, system by system.

First, read the following instructions on how to read the maps:

explainer2___________________________

With the explanations out of the way, here are the heat maps of 14 of Illinois and Chicago’s largest pension systems (click any of the maps for enlargement).

___________________________

SHOPPED TRS

SHOPPED cook countySHOPPED parks

SHOPPED SRS

SHOPPED SURS

SHOPPED judges legislators

SHOPPED chicago teachersSHOPPED chicago policeSHOPPED sanitary district  SHOPPED chicago transit  SHOPPED IMRF SHOPPED laborers SHOPPED MEABF SHOPPED metra pace rta

 

A few important notes: Members of the Chicago Laborer’s System, State Employees Retirement System and Illinois Municipal Retirement System are eligible for Social Security benefits. Members of all other systems are NOT eligible for Social Security benefits.

Maps include only pensioners with at least 10 years of service.

 Photo by Lu Lacerda via Flickr CC License

NY City Mayor Pitches Pension Funds on Coal Divestment

3128975331_4853432915_z

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio this week plans to approach the city’s pension funds about divesting from their coal holdings.

The five funds, which collectively oversee $160 billion in assets, would be the latest institutional investors to sell off coal investments – closely following the University of California’s decision to do so earlier this month.

More details from the Associated Press via ABC:

De Blasio administration officials told The Associated Press that the mayor will begin making his case to the city’s five pension funds on Tuesday.

New York City’s five public employee pension funds’ assets total more than $160 billion, with at least $33 million of exposure to thermal coal in the public markets.

De Blasio has set a goal to reduce the city’s greenhouse gas emission by 80 percent by 2050. He also will advise the pension boards to consider other environmentally friendly investments.

City Comptroller Scott Stringer, who is custodian to the funds’ boards and has also endorsed green policies, supports the measure.

As Pension360 has covered, CalSTRS and CalPERS are likely to divest from coal later this year, as the legislature recently passed a bill mandating such action.

 

Photo by  Paul Falardeau via Flickr CC License

CalSTRS “Disappointed” By Volkswagen Debacle

10521601625_85f7780b0c_z

CalSTRS, which holds nearly $40 million in Volkswagen stock, said it is “disappointed” by the company’s admission last week that it cheated emissions tests – a revelation which sent its stock price plummeting.

CalSTRS and other pension funds that hold shares in the car-maker said they are actively monitoring the situation. But ultimately, the losses will prove to be a drop in the bucket, according to fund spokespeople.

More from Bloomberg:

“Calstrs is clearly disappointed that a company in our portfolio has managed to simultaneously damage both its shareholder value and the environment that we’re pledging to protect,” said Michael Sicilia, a Calstrs spokesman. “As owners we actively monitor our holdings and expect our portfolio companies to govern themselves responsibly.”

[…]

The $286 billion California Public Employees’ Retirement System said it has about $165 million invested in Volkswagen. The fund, the biggest in the U.S., is “examining the situation and continue to monitor,” said spokesman Joe DeAnda.

New York state’s pension fund — which was worth $184.5 billion as of March 31 — has 22,927 ordinary shares of Volkswagen valued at about $5 million, according to Matt Sweeney, a spokesman for state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli, the fund’s sole trustee. It has another 159,979 shares of Volkswagen’s non-voting preferred shares worth $33.3 million, Sweeney said by e-mail.

The $50 billion Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation held 15,009 shares of Volkswagen stock as of June 30, valued at $3.47 million. “It doesn’t exactly move the needle, does it?” said Laura Achee, the fund’s director of communications.

The Teacher Retirement System of Texas declined to comment on its holdings but said that any investment in Volkswagen would be a drop in the bucket of its $132 billion assets, according to communications director Howard Goldman. At the $26 billion Employees Retirement System of Texas, which provides retirement benefits for state employees, retirees and their dependents, VW holdings are similarly negligible.

“We have some in equities and in fixed income, but very small,” said spokeswoman Mary Jane Wardlow in an e-mail.

Volkswagen has lost $30.3 billion of its market value since September 18.

 

Photo by Long Road Photography (formerly Aff) via Flickr CC License

A Pension Bond Reality Check

5857462455_b0929c5cbe_z

Allan Sloan is a seven-time winner of the Loeb Award, business journalism’s highest honor. This story originally appeared on ProPublica.

The scary stock market that we’ve seen since mid-August is a classic example of how reality keeps intruding on theory. And it shows how there really is no such thing as free money on Wall Street, no matter how beguiling the sales pitch.

The case in point: pension obligation bonds, a supposedly magic solution to the problem of underfunded government pensions. The idea is that governments with badly underfunded plans can borrow money at historically low rates, invest the borrowed cash in the stock market, and earn much more on stocks than the bonds cost in interest.

I wrote a skeptical article about these bonds in July, with Cezary Podkul as co-author. “Governments can borrow cheaply these days but the risks of investing pension bond proceeds are unusually high,” we said. Recent weeks have proved us right.

We warned that potential pension bond issuers such as Colorado and Pennsylvania would be taking a huge chance by selling billions of dollars of bonds at seemingly low rates and investing the cash in the then-stable stock market.

The idea, as presented by investment banks (which get fees for doing deals), is that pension bonds can be a magic elixir.

For two groups in particular, they profess, it’s just the thing: employee unions worried that underfunded pension plans could lead to benefit cuts, and public officials who want to improve pension-funding ratios without raising taxes or cutting benefits.

After all, the argument goes, you can’t go wrong selling bonds at about 5 percent interest to raise money to buy stocks, which have historically produced returns exceeding 10 percent.

Oops. Timing is everything. Had a government sold pension bonds on July 10, the day our article appeared, it would have suffered a double whammy. The Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index has dropped 6 percent since then, and interest rates on the kind of municipal bonds that make up a large piece of pension issues have fallen.

Had Colorado sold its proposed maximum of $12 billion in pension bonds on July 10 and put the proceeds into the S&P 500 that day, its portfolio would be about $700 million underwater. What’s more, its bonds would probably be carrying a somewhat-higher-than-current-market interest rate.

That’s because the rate on 30-year AA-rated taxable muni bonds, a major component of pension bond issues, was 4.74 percent Thursday, according to Bloomberg, down from 5 percent on July 10. Rates on the 20-year version of the bond, another major pension bond component, were down slightly, to 4.46 percent from 4.49 percent.

So Colorado, which fortunately for its taxpayers deferred the pension bond issue after state legislators got nervous 2014 would have had a large paper loss and would be paying what at least for now is an above-market rate on much of the borrowing.

“Recent market behavior has reminded us that markets have volatility and uncertainty and may not provide the returns we want, no matter how badly we need them,” said Ben Valore-Caplan, a Denver-based adviser to institutional investors who quit as vice chairman of the Colorado Public Employees’ Retirement Association board rather than be involved in a pension bond issue.

“Markets don’t care that a pension is underfunded,” he told me. “Pensions don’t get secret access to higher returns or lower risk. When they forget their place, the markets sooner or later will remind them.”

The S&P 500 has produced an average of 10.6 percent in price increases and reinvested dividends over the past 45 years. But that doesn’t mean you are guaranteed a double-digit return if you invest on a particular day. It’s about statistics: You can drown in a pond that’s an average of one foot deep if you happen to step into a 10-feet-deep part.

It’s one thing to invest in stocks over the long term. But investing gradually, over time, is a lot different than hocking yourself to the eyeballs and putting the borrowings into the market in one shot.

No, I’m not saying that stocks won’t recover and go on to new highs. What I am saying is that any government 2014 or any retail investor borrowing a ton of money and putting it all in the stock market at once is taking an enormous risk. It’s not a risk I would take myself. As recent months have shown, it’s not a risk that governments should take, either.

Allan Sloan can be reached at allan.sloan@washpost.com.

Cezary Podkul contributed research for this column.

 

Photo by TaxRebate.org.uk

Alaska Pension Board, Lawmakers Clash Over Asset Smoothing

alaska map

The board that oversees Alaska’s pension system is involved in a public dispute with the state’s legislature over a decision by lawmakers last year to eliminate “asset smoothing” at the pension fund.

In 2014, lawmakers sought to end smoothing at the pension fund because, at the time, it decreased the contributions required from the state. But board members question whether the decision was “actuarially sound”, particularly because the lack of smoothing could drive up state contributions by tens of millions this year.

More from the Alaska Dispatch:

A legislative budget scheme that may have been used to make budget numbers look better in the past threatens this year to drive up the state budget by $45 million.

[…]

The conflict started in 2014 when the Legislature agreed to support then-Gov. Sean Parnell’s request for $3 billion to shore up underfunded pension trust funds. But legislators added a number of provisions of their own, largely aimed at reducing annual payments to pay down that retirement liability.

One of those changes was to eliminate “asset smoothing,” the process by which trust fund investment returns are averaged over a five-year period to prevent dramatic swings in contribution rates.

The Legislature instead wanted the ARM Board to use real market values each year, not the averaged or smoothed numbers, to calculate annual retirement payments.

That immediately caused the board’s actuaries to raise concerns. One of those was David Slishinsky of Buck Consultants, who warned the state would face a “roller coaster ride” in future years as numbers would go up or down.

That reduced cost to the state then, but this year it increased costs substantially. Board member Kris Erchinger, who chairs its actuarial committee, said that actuaries ran the numbers and determined that with smoothing the cost for the retirement payment in next year’s budget would be $215,866,535, while without smoothing it would be $261,038,698.

Board members are now deciding whether they actually have to continue complying with the legislature’s directive to cease smoothing.

 

Photo credit: “Flag map of Alaska” by 2002_Winter_Olympics_torch_relay_route.svg: User:Mangoman88, using Blank_US_Map.svg by User:Theshibboleth – 2002_Winter_Olympics_torch_relay_route.svgFlag_of_Alaska.svg. Licensed under Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons.

Canada Pension Sues Hedge Fund Over Alleged Pricing Manipulation

117048243_7cc6bb0b87_z

Canada’s Public Sector Pension Investment Board filed a lawsuit on Friday against troubled manager Saba Capital Management and its founder, Boaz Weinstein, for allegedly manipulating the value of assets.

More from Bloomberg:

In a suit filed by the Public Sector Pension Investment Board, once one of the biggest investors in the $1.6 billion Saba Capital Management, the pension fund accused Weinstein of “shortchanging” it by marking down a “significant” portion of the fund’s assets after the retirement plan asked that all its money be returned at the end of the first quarter. The next month, after the pension’s exit, Saba raised the value of the holdings, according to the lawsuit.

[…]

The court fight could invite scrutiny from the Securities and Exchange Commission, which has cited valuations as one of its priorities this year and anticipates bringing cases involving pricing of portfolios.

The pension fund, which oversees the retirement savings of Canadian federal public servants, said it was the Saba Offshore Feeder Fund’s largest investor, having invested $500 million over the course of 2012 and 2013 and accounting for 55 percent of the fund’s assets. The plan said it had asked Saba for its money back early this year, saying Saba’s 2014 losses appeared to be “unrelated to any market development that could or should have adversely affected the fund’s performance had the fund been properly managed,’’ according to the lawsuit.

Canada’s Public Sector Pension oversees about $85 billion in assets.

 

Photo by Joe Gratz via Flickr CC License

Illinois Gov. Rauner Rebuffs Claims of Politics Influencing Pension Investments

rauner

The Illinois State Board of Investment – the entity that manages investments for three of the state’s smaller pension systems – recently voted to shift $697 million from active managers into index-type vehicles.

Opponents say Rauner and his appointees had an ulterior political motive, because the strategy shift required divesting almost $70 million from a union-run investment firm, despite strong returns.

But Rauner’s side says they are simply seeking more efficient, low-cost investments that track markets.

From the Chicago Sun-Times:

In line with Rauner’s anti-organized labor stance, one of the managers the board dumped was Ullico, a union-owned investment firm that lends money to construction projects that agree to hire union labor.

Unlike the three other firms that the Rauner appointees voted to terminate, Ullico wasn’t fired for “underperforming” on investment returns.

Rather, the company had been placed on the state pension board’s “watch list” because too much of its portfolio — 52 percent — was being held in cash, waiting to be lent. Ullico’s returns, though, had been slightly better than those of investment funds it was measured against, board records show.

[…]

The money invested with Ullico will be transferred to Garcia Hamilton & Associates, a Texas firm that plans to invest it in a less-complicated, fixed-income fund. That company will charge fees significantly lower than Ullico’s on the returns it produces — from .78 cents on the dollar to .09 cents.

Fees also will be cut as a result of the board’s decision to withdraw its investments in funds managed by the other three money managers: Ariel Investments, Herndon Capital Management and Wellington Management. In all, the board paid nearly $2.3 million in fees on all four deals last year, including $433,774 to Ullico.

Those fees are expected to plummet to $218,000 with their transfer into stock and bond index funds designed to track the financial markets.

The Board of Investment oversees $15.3 billion for the Illinois State Employees Retirement System, the General Assembly Retirement System and the Judges’ Retirement System.

 

Photo by Tricia Scully via Flickr CC License


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /home/mhuddelson/public_html/pension360.org/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 3712