arizona Public Safety Personnel Retirement System | Pension360

Tens of thousands of Arizona retirees were hoping to begin receiving larger benefit checks in the coming months. That may happen eventually for the 120,000 retired members of the Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS), but it won’t happen this year.

That’s because benefit increases, such as COLA increases, are tied to the fund’s long-term performance. And despite posting the second-best annual investment return in the last decade—18.6 percent net of fees—the ASRS still has work to do to meet the benchmarks that permit it to increase benefits.

From the Arizona Republic:

For a permanent benefit increase to kick in at ASRS, the trust must produce a rate of return in excess of 8 percent — the assumed rate of investment growth — for 10 years and generate a pool of excess earnings.

Simple averaging shows that benchmark has been met, but there is another caveat: The formula to pay cost-of-living adjustments uses a “geometric and actuarially smoothed average,” which takes into account compounding.

That formula, dragged down by heavy investment losses during the 2007-09 recession, puts the 10-year rate of return at 7.6 percent, [ASRS Chief Executive Paul] Matson said, which is below the trigger.

“We are certainly getting closer to it,” Matson said.

The funded status — a measure of the amount needed to pay current and future pension liabilities at ASRS — is projected to be 76.6 percent. Less money is needed from employees and employers the closer the figure is to 100 percent. A funded ratio of 80 percent is considered “healthy” in public retirement systems.

Arizona’s other major pension fund, the Arizona Public Safety Personnel Retirement System, posted an annual return of about 15 percent gross of fees.

The performance of the ASRS may not warrant benefit increases, but the fund’s investment staff may still be in line for bonuses. From the Arizona Republic:

Matson said it is unclear if his investment staff will receive bonuses, even with the exceptional financial returns. He said there are other benchmarks that must be met, and a determination won’t be made for eight to 10 weeks.

Matson said bonuses are needed to retain quality staff to oversee the portfolio and garner solid rates of return.

“Without good staff, there are detriments to performing well,” he said.

Pension360 has previously covered the controversial bonuses given to the investment staff of the other major fund in Arizona, the APSPR.

Photo by: “Arizona-StateSeal” by U.S. Government. Licensed under Public domain via Wikimedia Commons

Pension360 has been closely following the story of Jim Hacking, the recently fired Director of the Public Safety Personnel Retirement System. He’s been embroiled in trouble of late, as his fund is in the midst of an FBI criminal investigation—centered on claims that the staff inflated real estate investment values to trigger bonuses—as well as a workplace investigation spawned from sexual harassment allegations.

When he gave illegal raises to five employees on his investment staff earlier this year, it was the last straw. He was placed on administrative leave and fired shortly after.

But he won’t be leaving without some handsome benefits. Those include a severance package, a pension, and the promise that the Retirement System will pay all Hacking’s legal bills and travel expenses.

From the Arizona Republic:

Jim Hacking, a former Arizona public-safety pension administrator who authorized illegal staff pay raises, will receive a severance of roughly $107,250, an annual pension of $86,704, and a commitment to cover all his bills should he be named in “any legal proceeding.”

Other records the newspaper obtained detail the lifetime annual pension Hacking is projected to receive for his roughly nine years of employment, as well as a $16,406 payout for unused vacation time.

More specifics on the settlement, of which the Arizona Republic obtained a copy:

The settlement calls for:

• Hacking to be paid through Dec. 31.

• Hacking and the retirement system to agree to not sue each other.

• The retirement system to pay all “reasonable” travel expenses should Hacking, who has a home in St. Paul, Minn., be required to attend a meeting, deposition or hearing in Arizona.

• The retirement system to cover all of Hacking’s potential legal costs.

“Should Mr. Hacking be personally named as a defendant in any legal proceeding arising out of or relating to actions taken in the course and scope of his employment, the system agrees to fully defend and indemnify Mr. Hacking against such claim(s), including court costs and attorneys’ fees,” the settlement reads.

Some additional background and context on this case from the Republic, in case you need a refresher:

Hacking’s departure comes after a year in which four high-level staff members quit amid allegations that the trust used inflated real-estate values in annual reports to improve its financial performance and trigger bonuses. Hacking denies the allegations.

The PSPRS board in December unanimously voted to extend Hacking’s contract by one year, even though the four staff members had resigned between June and September because of the real-estate controversy.

Tobin executed Hacking’s extension on March 11. That was four days after the board hired a criminal defense attorney to deal with a federal grand-jury subpoena in relation to an FBI investigation.

Hacking in November sought raises for five employees. He told the board the hikes were to replace a controversial bonus program the board had suspended. And, Hacking noted, his staff was doing more work with the exodus of the other employees.

A divided board approved the raises, but it also needed approval from the state Department of Administration under a 2012 personnel reform law Brewer pushed through the Legislature.

The Department of Administration had held off approving those raises because of the numerous controversies. In early July, The Republic asked PSPRS the status of those raises and was told the ADOA had approved them.

Department officials told the newspaper that the ADOA never approved the raises, then began an investigation. Although Hacking had actively negotiated with the ADOA this year on the raises and led state personnel officials to believe they had not gone into effect, Hacking ordered his human-resources director to implement the raises in December, according to trust records.

Hacking, 68, will receive a five-figure pension because, as PSPRS administrator, he oversaw the Elected Officials’ Retirement Plan and was entitled by law to receive a pension from that system, even though he never was voted into public office.

Tag: arizona Public Safety Personnel Retirement System

Arizona Fund’s Strong Performance May Lead To Bigger Retiree Benefits—But Not This Year

Big Payout, Benefits for Arizona Fund Boss Fired for Misconduct