Tag: CPP

Canada Pension Plan Among Bidders For $10 Billion of Cement Facilities

private equity investment

The Canada Pension Plan (CPP) has teamed up with Blackstone Group and Cinven to bid on $10 billion of cement assets that are being sold as a result of a pending merger between two major building material suppliers.

The CPP is one of 60 parties who have placed bids.

From the Wall Street Journal:

Private-equity firms are jostling to acquire more than $10 billion of cement facilities being sold as part of the merger of two large European companies, reflecting the dearth of buyout deals available in the region.

The sale of the cement assets in Europe, Canada, Brazil and the Philippines are a precondition to winning antitrust approval of a $50-billion merger between French cement giant Lafarge SA and Swiss rival Holcim Ltd.

The assets have attracted interest among cash-flush private-equity firms. Some 60 parties, a mixture of buyout firms and building-materials companies, have submitted bids for all or some of the assets, said Holcim finance chief Thomas Aebischer. Private-equity bidders include Blackstone Group, KKR & Co. and other top firms, according to people familiar with the matter.

[…]

The cement deals are “sort of classic private-equity assets,” said Josh Lerner, a professor at Harvard Business School, of the Holcim and Lafarge sales. “The idea of a transaction that has the classic PE kind of recipe, where this is a mature industry, is a good thing for them.”

The deal is also attractive because it could create an entirely new cement rival overnight. Some argue creating a new company with the assets could be a challenge for buyers, since the facilities are spread across the globe and aren’t independent companies at this stage.

The $10 billion price-tag on the for-sale assets is too big for many private-equity firms to digest on their own. Many are forming groups to bid for the assets, a practice they have moved away from in recent years since investors prefer to spread their money among several funds invested in different assets.

Among the private-equity bidders are: a group consisting of Blackstone Group, Cinven and the Canada Pension Plan; BC Partners and Advent International; Bain Capital and Onex Partners; and KKR., according to the people familiar with the matter. Industry bidders include Irish cement maker CRH PLC, according to people familiar with the matter. The structure of the consortia could still change, said one person familiar with the deal.

The Canada Pension Plan has $227 billion in assets, which are managed by the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board.

 

Photo by Parée via Flickr CC License

Kolivakis: Time To Face The “Brutal Truth” About Defined-Contribution Plans

401k jar with one hundred bills inside

Leo Kolivakis, the man behind the Pension Pulse blog, has long been a critic of replacing defined-benefit plans with 401(k)-style plans as a means of reforming public pension systems.

The Canadian Public Pension Leadership Council released a report last week arguing that converting large public DB pension plans to DC plans would be costly and ineffective. In light of that report, Kolivakis took to his blog to re-explain his aversion to the oft-considered reform tactic. From Pension Pulse:

I’m glad Canada’s large public pension funds got together to fund this new initiative to properly inform the public on why converting public sector defined-benefit plans to private sector defined-contribution plans is a more costly option.

Skeptics will claim that this new association is biased and the findings of this paper support the continuing activities of their organizations. But if you ask me, it’s high time we put a nail in the coffin of defined-contribution plans once and for all. The overwhelming evidence on the benefits of defined-benefit plans is irrefutable, which is why I keep harping on enhancing the CPP for all Canadians regardless of whether they work in the public or private sector.

And while shifting to defined-contribution plans might make perfect rational sense for a private company, the state ends up paying the higher social costs of such a shift. As I recently discussed, trouble is brewing at Canada’s private DB plans, and with the U.S. 10-year Treasury yield sinking to a 16-month low today, I expect public and private pension deficits to swell (if the market crashes, it will be a disaster for all pensions!).

Folks, the next ten years will be very rough. Historic low rates, record inflows into hedge funds, the real possibility of global deflation emanating from Europe, will all impact the returns of public and private assets. In this environment, I can’t underscore how important it will be to be properly diversified and to manage assets and liabilities much more closely.

And if you think defined-contribution plans are the solution, think again. Why? Apart from the fact that they’re more costly because they don’t pool resources and lower fees — or pool investment risk and longevity risk — they are also subject to the vagaries of public markets, which will be very volatile in the decade(s) ahead and won’t offer anything close to the returns of the last 30 years. That much I can guarantee you (just look at the starting point with 10-year U.S. treasury yield at 2.3%, pensions will be lucky to achieve 5 or 6% rate of return objective).

Public pension funds are far from perfect, especially in the United States where the governance is awful and constrains states from properly compensating their public pension fund managers. But if countries are going to get serious about tackling pension poverty once and for all, they will bolster public pensions for all their citizens and introduce proper reforms to ensure the long-term sustainability of these plans.

Finally, if you think shifting public sector DB plans into DC plans will help lower public debt, think again. The social welfare costs of such a shift will completely swamp the short-term reduction in public debt. Only economic imbeciles at right-wing “think tanks” will argue against this but they’re completely and utterly clueless on what we need to improve pension policy for all our citizens.

The brutal truth on defined-contribution plans is they’re more costly and not properly diversified across public and private assets. More importantly, they will exacerbate pension poverty which is why we have to enhance the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) for all Canadians allowing more people to retire in dignity and security. These people will have a guaranteed income during their golden years and thus contribute more to sales taxes, reducing public debt.

Read his entire post on the subject here.

 

Photo by TaxCredits.net