Raymond M. Sarola, an attorney and former trustee of New York City’s pension systems, has penned a column explaining how trustees can ensure they don’t violate the SEC’s pay-to-play rules, and how they can handle a violation if one does occurs.
The column, published in Pensions & Investments, begins with an overview of the rule in question:
The rule — Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 206(4)-5…prohibits investment advisers from receiving compensation for advisory services to a government entity for two years after the advisory firm or any covered employee makes a political contribution to a public official or candidate who is or would be in a position to influence the award of investment advisory business by public retirement funds. The rule allows covered employees to make contributions up to $350 per official or candidate per election in which they can vote, or $150 for other elections. Contributions by investment firms in any amount would trigger a violation of the rule.
Sarola then lays out options for how trustees can ensure compliance, and what steps to take if a violation has occurred:
Public retirement plan executives should become familiar with the options available if a violation of the SEC rule occurs.
The rule provides for advisory firms that violated the rule to give the public plan sufficient time to redeem or transfer its assets on an uncompensated basis. This provision is particularly important with alternative investment vehicles that invest in illiquid assets and typically restrict the ability of limited partners to redeem committed capital.
Public retirement plans should develop and implement written policies that confirm compliance with this rule by investment advisers. These policies may include a requirement that advisers make a certification of compliance before an initial investment is made, with an ongoing obligation to recertify throughout the life of the investment.
Public plans might also wish to include in their policies a ban on future investment transactions with investment managers who fail to comply with the procedural or substantive requirements of the rule. And public plans should consider including in investment advisory contracts or side letters provisions that address remedial actions if a violation of the rule occurs. For instance, a contract might specify that if a violation occurs, the adviser will continue to provide services under the contract without compensation for up to two years while the pension fund seeks efficient means to transfer its assets. Other remedial measures might require the investment manager to repay the amount paid or promised to a placement agent involved in winning the business.
The full column can be read here.