ABSTRACT: Why do public-sector workers receive so much of their compensation in the form of pensions and other benefits? This paper presents a political economy model in which politicians compete for taxpayers’ and government employees’ votes by promising compensation packages, but some voters cannot evaluate every aspect of promised compensation.
Public Pension Reform in California
ABSTRACT: The Public Employee Pension Reform Act became effective in 2013. It will take many years before it has a meaningful impact on pension plan underfunding due to the so-called California Rule under which public employees are guaranteed the pension benefits in force on the date of hire.
Neoliberal Temporality: Time-Sense and the Shift from Pensions to 401(k)s
ABSTRACT: The decline of traditional pensions and the rise of individualized retirement accounts such as 401(k)s can be read as a neoliberal program of transferring risk and responsibility for providing retirement income from employers to workers.
The Influence of Pension Funds on Corporate Governance
ABSTRACT: Although pension funds have gained importance in the last two decades, their role has not been described in detail by economic models. This article focuses on the scope of these institutional investors when they are not satisfied with a management team of a company in which the pension fund holds a block of shares.
Task force to Jacksonville: raise taxes to save pensions
When it comes to funding its pension system, Jacksonville doesn’t have the best track record. In fact, it has just about the worst: only Chicago and Philadelphia run pension funds that are unhealthier than Jacksonville’s.
With that in mind, the city put together a task force to recommend ways to improve the solvency of its pension system. That’s no easy task, considering that most solutions are bound to be unpalatable to a large segment of the population.
In a 51-page report released today, the task force called for shared sacrifice—higher employee contributions, higher retirement ages for some and higher taxes for all.
The specifics, from the Florida Times-Union:
Taxpayers — The City Council would increase property taxes and give voters a choice whether to replace the higher property taxes with a half-cent sales tax. The extra money would pay down faster what the city owes the Police and Fire Pension Fund.
Police and firefighters — Their share of money from their paychecks going to retirements would rise to 10 percent from the current 7 percent rate. New hires would work longer to get pensions. Current workers would have smaller cost-of-living adjustments on portions of their pensions.
Police and Fire Pension Fund — The board would appoint an investment advisory committee. The board would have greater leeway to make investments that are riskier but can generate higher returns to support pension obligations.
Jacksonville’s pension system is only 39% funded.
California Teachers’ Retirement System: 2014 SBMA Funding Projections
Income as the Outcome: How to Broaden the Narrow Framing of U.S. Retirement Policy
ABSTRACT: This article provides a brief review of behavioral economics research on annuitization. It applies the lessons learned from this literature to examine how public policy toward defined contribution plans has narrowly framed the conversation about retirement in a manner that may discourage the provision of lifetime income.
What do Unions do to Pension Performance?
ABSTRACT: Unions can have either positive or negative effects on risk-adjusted returns in pension plans. On the positive side, a union can improve monitoring of pension advisors and asset managers. On the negative side, the union may sacrifice returns by making investments that promote union goals.
Optimal Taxes and Pensions with Myopic Agents
ABSTRACT: So far the economic literature has concentrated on analyzing the income tax and pension scheme in isolation. The present paper asks how both transfer schemes should be optimally designed in a society where individuals differ in productivity and rationality.
Oklahoma moves forward with bill aiming to eliminate traditional pensions for state workers
Oklahoma’s landscape is dotted with abandoned frontier forts, Civil War battle sites and other relics of history.
Now you might be able to add another relic to that list: state sponsored defined-benefit pension plans, which could soon become a remnant of the past in Oklahoma.
The state’s House of Representatives passed a bill today that would shift newly hired state workers from the current defined-benefit system into a 401(k)-style defined-contribution plan.
Under the plan, employees would allocate at least 3% of their paychecks to the retirement plan, and the state would match those contributions up to 7%.
The bill doesn’t apply to teachers, firefighters or police officers, and would only cover state workers who are hired after November 1, 2015.
The Associated Press has more details:
The state worker salary bill would set aside 3 percent of the previous fiscal year’s payroll costs for salary adjustments each year and give the Office of Management Enterprise Services authority to set pay structures and determine if targeted adjustments are needed.
Its author, Rep. Leslie Osborn, R-Mustang, said it will provide initial raises to the state’s lowest-paid workers, including corrections, human services and public safety workers, at a cost of about $40 million.
State worker salaries are about 20 percent below comparable jobs in the competitive labor market. The measure would boost salaries to 90 percent of private-sector pay over four years.
Opponents of the measure are concerned that it shifts too much risk onto workers. The payout of a 401(k) plan is determined by the performance of its underlying investments, which means an economic downturn would severely decrease the value of retirees’ nest eggs.
The bill now moves to the Senate, where it is expected to pass.
Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /home/mhuddelson/public_html/pension360.org/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 3712
Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /home/mhuddelson/public_html/pension360.org/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 3712
Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /home/mhuddelson/public_html/pension360.org/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 3712
Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /home/mhuddelson/public_html/pension360.org/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 3712
Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /home/mhuddelson/public_html/pension360.org/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 3712
Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /home/mhuddelson/public_html/pension360.org/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 3712
Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /home/mhuddelson/public_html/pension360.org/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 3712
Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /home/mhuddelson/public_html/pension360.org/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 3712
Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /home/mhuddelson/public_html/pension360.org/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 3712