Chicago Rejects Rauner’s Surprise Pension Proposal

chicago

The Chicago Public School system (CPS) has less than a week to make a $634 million payment to the Chicago Teachers’ Pension Fund (the deadline is June 30).

Mayor Emanuel has been pushing the Fund to accept a partial payment; additionally, lawmakers this week considered a bill to extend the payment’s deadline by six weeks, but the measure failed.

On Thursday, Gov. Rauner made a last-minute pitch to help CPS alleviate some pension costs – but the city promptly rejected Rauner’s proposal due to the long-term costs involved.

From the Chicago Tribune:

In a new wrinkle, Rauner said that he would support a proposal for the state to pick up more of the tab for Chicago teacher pensions, an issued pushed by Mayor Rahm Emanuel as Chicago Public Schools faces a massive pension payment due Tuesday.

Emanuel administration officials said that the mayor was blindsided by Rauner’s school pension proposal, adding that the Republican governor’s solution would hurt CPS.

Rauner attempted to address the issue Thursday by offering to have the state pay for the district’s so-called normal pension costs — the annual amount CPS owes to the pension fund, not including years’ worth of missed payments that were signed off on by state lawmakers. In exchange for paying for those annual pension costs, Rauner said the state would stop funding block grants for the district as part of a new school funding formula he said would be put into effect by the end of 2016.

Emanuel officials, however, argued that the deal would cost CPS $400 million.

Anonymous Chicago officials cited by the Tribune called the deal “not a very even trade.”

 

Photo by bitsorf via Flickr CC License

Military Pension Overhaul Hits Snag As Bill Passed, Then Blocked, By Senate

military

A proposed overhaul of the U.S. military’s pension system, endorsed by the Pentagon last week, has now hit a roadblock.

The overhaul was one piece of a much larger military bill that included banning the use of torture.

The Senate passed the bill on Thursday, and then threw up an obstacle. From the New York Times:

The Senate on Thursday passed a $600 billion defense policy bill that would rein in pension costs, ban the use of torture and authorize lethal offensive weapons for Ukraine. But it then immediately rejected a measure to pay for it, the first battle in a spending fight that could end in a government shutdown this fall.

The blocking of the military appropriations bill was the first in a series of rejections Democrats have promised as they try to force Republicans into reopening budget talks.

Democrats — and many Republicans — want to lift spending limits imposed in 2011 that are just now being applied across an array of government programs. Absent new bipartisan budget talks — the sort that have often failed in Congress before — President Obama has pledged to veto spending bills if Democrats do not kill them on the Senate floor first.

The defense bill was a particular thorn to Democrats because as written, the Defense Department would be authorized to shift an extra $38 billion in war funds into its regular operating budget. Democrats and the White House have denounced that as a gimmick designed to let the military get around spending restrictions other federal agencies must abide.

As mentioned above, the blocking of the bill has little to do with the retirement overhaul portion of the measure.

 

Photo by Brian Schlumbohm/Fort Wainwright PAO

Kenneth Feinberg Appointed to Oversee Benefit Reductions for Multi-Employer Plans

4255734876_0fbdc2f4a0_z

Congress last year passed legislation that allows trustees of some multiemployer pension plans to submit proposals for benefit reductions; the process is designed to give funding relief to the country’s most troubled private plans.

This week, renowned mediator Kenneth Feinberg was appointed to review those proposed benefit cuts and ensure their legality under the recently passed law.

More from the Wall Street Journal:

Under the new law, trustees of many troubled plans will propose benefit cuts to stave off insolvency. Mr. Feinberg’s job will be to review the applications to make sure they comply with the new law’s conditions.

The choice of Mr. Feinberg is aimed at reassuring workers and retirees that they will be treated fairly in the painful process. He termed it a “very, very difficult, challenging assignment,” in a conference call on Wednesday morning.

[…]

Under the legislation, plan participants can vote to disapprove a benefit cut that is proposed by a plan’s trustees. But any vote disapproving a cut could be overridden for a plan that poses a threat to the federal safety net.

The process set up by last year’s legislation likely won’t end the problems. The federal safety-net agency for private pensions, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., last year projected its long-term deficit for multiemployer plans to be about $42 billion.

Mr. Feinberg is reportedly doing the job pro-bono.

 

Photo by  Bob Jagendorf via Flickr CC License

Chicago Pushing Teachers’ Pension to Accept Partial Contribution As Deadline Nears

chicago

The Chicago Public School system has until June 30 to make a $634 million contribution to the Chicago Teachers Pension Fund.

But the city is pushing the pension fund to help out cash-strapped CPS by accepting a much smaller payment – potentially as low as $200 million.

There’s a lot at stake, including CPS’ bond rating and potential legal action.

From the Chicago Sun-Times:

Never before has [Chicago Public School system] either missed or reduced a pension payment the district wasn’t authorized to skip or cut by the Illinois General Assembly.

A partial payment this time around would be a dubious and dangerous first that could trigger a pension fund lawsuit and a further drop in a CPS bond rating that’s already been reduced to junk status.

But sources said top mayoral aides are arguing behind the scenes that desperate times require desperate measures.

[…]

A $200 million payment is all the system can afford without massive layoffs and classroom cuts, City Hall contends.

Charles Burbridge, executive director of the Chicago Teachers Pension Fund, is resisting any partial payment.

“The Chicago Teachers’ Pension Fund expects full payment from the Board of Education and has not been given specific direction otherwise. Full payments are crucial to the long-term viability of the fund. Beyond that we won’t speculate on events that are yet to occur,” Burbridge was quoted as saying in an emailed statement.

Emanuel’s office contends that if CPS makes the full contribution, schools will be forced to cut back classroom costs to the tune of $1600 per student.

The Chicago Teachers Pension Fund is 51 percent funded.

 

Photo by bitsorf via Flickr CC LIcense

New Jersey Supreme Court Sides With Christie On Scrapped Pension Contribution

ChrisChristie2

The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the state acted legally when it deeply slashed its scheduled 2015 pension contribution despite a 2011 law, signed by Christie, which mandated the full payment.

The 5-2 decision was a reversal of a lower court decision earlier this year that sided with public workers on the issue.

More from Philly.com:

The New Jersey Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that public workers do not have a legally enforceable contract to greater pension funding, handing Gov. Christie a significant victory in a yearlong battle with public-sector unions.

Even though a 2011 law Christie signed explicitly granted workers a contractual right to pension funding, the 5-2 decision said that the state constitution prohibited the governor and the Legislature from establishing such a right without voter approval, because it created a debt.

With the ruling, the state averted a potential fiscal crisis. State lawmakers had faced the prospect of having to add nearly $1.6 billion to the pension system before the end of the fiscal year, June 30. Budget officials had warned that wouldn’t be possible, because the state had already disbursed money for school aid and other services.

[…]

Crucial to the case, the law also granted public workers a contractual right to greater pension funding.

But facing what he described as an unprecedented revenue shortfall last year, Christie slashed the state’s contribution to the pension system for both fiscal years 2014 and the current one.

Public worker unions are upset because the 2011 law trimmed benefits and increased worker contributions, but the trade-off was supposed to be guaranteed contributions from the state. Workers say they held up their end of the bargain; but only three years after the law was signed, Gov. Christie slashed the state’s 2014 and 2015 payments by billions.

 

Photo By Walter Burns [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

CalPERS to Cut Outside Managers by 50%

Calpers

As part of an ongoing strategy to cut investment-related expenses, CalPERS will be cutting the number of external investment managers it works with by 50 percent over the next five years, according to a Wall Street Journal report.

CalPERS announced last year that it would look into cutting two-thirds of its private equity managers. But this new development will see the pension fund cutting managers in other parts of its portfolio.

From the Wall Street Journal:

The California Public Employees’ Retirement System, or Calpers, will tell its investment board on June 15 of its plans to reduce the number of direct relationships it has with private-equity, real-estate and other external funds to about 100 from 212, said Chief Investment Officer Ted Eliopoulos. The action will be made public on Monday.

[…]

The pullback would take place over the next five years and is expected to save Calpers hundreds of millions of dollars in management fees. It paid $1.6 billion to external managers last year.

The reduction in outside managers won’t fundamentally change Calpers’s investment strategy, or the percentage of assets managed in-house versus externally. The remaining 100 or so outside managers will simply get a bigger pool of funds varying from $350 million to more than $1 billion, Mr. Eliopoulos added.

The goal, Mr. Eliopoulos said, is “to gain the best deal on costs and fees that we can.”

CalPERS is the largest pension fund in the United States, and manages over $300 billion in assets.

 

Photo by  rocor via Flickr CC License

California Senate Passes Bill Mandating Coal Divestment for CalPERS, CalSTRS

3128975331_4853432915_z

The California Senate this week passed a sweeping climate change-oriented bill, which includes a provision requiring CalPERS and CalSTRS to divest from coal holdings.

The two pension funds hold around $300 million in coal-related assets.

More from the East Bay Express:

The California State Senate voted today to urge the California Public Employees Retirement System and California State Teachers Retirement System to divest from coal companies due to their massive greenhouse gas emissions that are fueling climate change.

[…]

The state Senate’s vote is at odds with the pension funds. Both CalPERS and CalSTRS have adopted so-called engagement policies instead of divestment. Last July, Anne Simpson, the senior portfolio manager and director of global governance for CalPERS, wrote in an op-ed for the Sacramento Bee that CalPERS has been “at the forefront of tackling climate change issues through policy advocacy, engagement with companies and investments in climate change solutions,” and that “divestment means losing a seat at the table” to press for these kinds of changes. CalSTRS spokesperson Ricardo Duran told the Express that CalSTRS is studying the climate threat of coal, but that the fund has made no commitment to divest.

The bill now goes to the General Assembly.

Photo by  Paul Falardeau via Flickr CC License

Rhode Island Rolls Out Transparency Standards for Investment Managers

317px-Flag-map_of_Rhode_Island.svg

Rhode Island Treasurer Seth Magaziner has overhauled a portion of the state’s investment policy with a series of measured designed to encourage transparency from the investment managers trusted with state funds.

Under the new initiative, new managers – including those working with the state pension fund – will have to publicly disclose performance, fees and other data.

More from Pensions & Investments:

Mr. Magaziner’s “Transparent Treasury” initiative requires money managers wishing to do business with Rhode Island to publicly disclose information about their performance, fees, expenses and liquidity. Going forward, all fund managers will be required to sign a transparency pledge, agreeing to the release of this information before they will be allowed to oversee Rhode Island state investments.

[…]

“Going forward, Rhode Island will only do business with fund managers that allow us to publish information on performance, fees, expenses and liquidity,” said Mr. Magaziner in a phone interview.

In addition to requiring disclosures of all new funds in which Rhode Island invests, the treasurer’s office is currently in the process of reaching out to the state’s existing fund managers to ask them to voluntarily meet these new standards for current investments. Going forward, existing managers would also be required to provide the information for new investments, Mr. Magaziner said.

As a part of Mr. Magaziner’s transparency initiative, the treasury office will begin reporting fund expenses at an aggregate level immediately and on a fund-by-fund basis later this year.

The State Investment Commission, the body that oversees state pension investments, approved the transparency guidelines last week.

 

Photo credit: “Flag-map of Rhode Island” by Darwinek – self-made using Image:Flag of Rhode Island.svg and Image:USA Rhode Island location map.svg. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

San Bernardino Exit Plan Cuts Some Pension Costs

san bern

Reporter Ed Mendel covered the Capitol in Sacramento for nearly three decades, most recently for the San Diego Union-Tribune. Find more of his stories at Calpensions.com.

A San Bernardino plan to exit bankruptcy follows the path of the Vallejo and Stockton exit plans, cutting bond debt and retiree health care but not pensions. Then it veers off in a new direction: contracting for fire, waste management and other services.

The contract services are expected to reduce city pension costs. Other pension savings come from a sharp increase in employee payments toward pensions and from a payment of only 1 percent on a $50 million bond issued in 2005 to cover pensions costs.

Last week, a member of the city council had a question as a long-delayed “plan of adjustment” to exit the bankruptcy, declared in August 2012, was approved on a 6-to-1 vote, meeting a May 30 deadline imposed by a federal judge.

“The justification from what I’m understanding from the plan — the justification for contracting is more or less to save the city from the pension obligation. Is that correct?” said Councilman Henry Nickel.

One of the slides outlining the summary of the recovery plan said: “CalPERS costs continue to escalate, making in-house service provision for certain functions unsustainable.”

The city manager, Allen Parker, told Nickel “that’s part of it” but not the “entirety.”

In addition to pension savings, he said, contracting with a private firm for refuse collection now handled through a special fund is expected to yield a “$5 million payment up front” into the deficit-ridden city general fund.

Parker said the California Public Employees Retirement System safety rate for firefighters is between 45 and 55 percent of base pay. “So if you have a fireman making say $100,000 a year, there is another $50,000 a year that goes to CalPERS,” he said.

An actuary estimated that contracting for fire services could save the city $2 million a year in pension costs, Parker said. The city expects total savings of $7 million or more a year, similar to a Santa Ana contract with the Orange County Fire Authority.

Unlike other unions, firefighters have not voluntarily agreed to help the struggling city by taking a 10 percent pay cut and foregoing merit increases. The cost of firefighter overtime has averaged $6.5 million in recent years.

After the court allowed the city to overturn a firefighter contract requiring “constant manning” last year, the city expected reduced staffing during off-hours. But overtime has not decreased, wiping out anticipated savings of $2.5 million this year.

Negotiations with the firefighters are difficult, Parker said, and their union has filed several lawsuits. He said the situation is “out of hand” and “can’t be contained,” part of the reason for the plan to contract for fire services.

The city expects fire service bids from San Bernardino County and others. A private firm, Centerra, has shown interest. Councilman Nickel said a legislator called about contracting with a private firm, suggesting “concern at the state level.”

Parker said a contract with a private firm would need a mutual aid agreement with neighboring government fire services. He said a San Manuel private fire service has been accepted by a fire chiefs association that manages the regional agreements.

Contracting for police services is not planned. Parker said the “one possible agency,” the San Bernardino County Sheriff‘s Department, made a $60 million proposal in 2012, reaffirmed last year, that would not yield city savings.

Fire and waste management are the biggest opportunities for savings and revenue among 15 options for contracting city services listed in the recovery plan summary. City employees are expected to be rehired by contractors.

Estimated annual savings are listed for contracting five other services: business licenses $650,000 to $900,000, fleet maintenance $400,000, soccer complex management $240,000 to $320,000, custodial $150,000, and graffiti abatement $132,600.

San Bernardino plan to return to solvency

In the 1960s, San Bernardino was the “epitome of middle-class living,” said the plan summary, and then a “profound and continuous decline” turned it into the poorest California city of its size (214,000).

Median San Bernardino household income was at the California average in 1969, an inflation-adjusted $54,999, before steadily falling by 2013 to $38,385, well below the state average of $61,094.

Financial trouble began before the recession. A unique form of government created “crippling ambiguities” of authority among the city manager, mayor, council and elected city attorney, leaving no one clearly in charge as the city slowly sank.

When the reckoning finally came in 2012, San Bernardino faced an $18 million cash shortfall and an inability to make payroll. After an emergency bankruptcy filing, the city became the first to skip its annual payments to CalPERS.

Now the skipped payment of $14.5 million is being repaid over two fiscal years with equal installments of about $7.2 million. The recovery plan also said with no elaboration: “FY 2019-20: $400,000 annually in penalties and interest.”

Replying to Nickel last week, the city manager explained why, if most employees are to be replaced by contract services, the plan does not propose to cut CalPERS debt. The city’s pensions have an “unfunded liability” of $285 million and are 74 percent funded.

Parker said the plan protects pension amounts already earned by city employees, even with a new employer, and like the Stockton and Vallejo plans reflects the view that pensions are needed to compete with other government employers in the job market.

“We naively thought we could negotiate more successfully, but that didn’t necessarily happen,” Parker said of mediation with CalPERS. An early plan called for a “fresh start” stretching out pension payments, yielding small savings in the first years.

And like Vallejo but not Stockton, which said from the outset it did not want to cut pensions, Parker said there was fear of a costly and lengthy legal battle with deep-pocketed CalPERS, possibly all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

One of the unique provisions in the San Bernardino city charter, which voters declined to overturn last year, bases police and firefighter pay on the average safety pay in 10 other cities, not labor bargaining.

Despite that link, police and firefighter compensation is said to be 8 to 10 percent below market because of low benefits. The bankrupt city stopped paying the employee CalPERS share and raised police and firefighters rates to 14 percent of pay.

Higher pension contributions from employees saved the city about $8 million last fiscal year, the plan said. Retiree health payments were reduced from a maximum of $450 per month to $112 per month, saving $213,750 last year.

“The filing of the plan is only the beginning of a long and very difficult process regarding confirmation and continued litigation with some of our creditors,” the city attorney, Gary Saenz, told the city council last week.

Berdoo

 

Photo by  Pete Zarria via Flickr CC License

ESG Criteria Rapidly Becoming Part of Decision-Making Process For Institutional Investors, Says Study

7519781092_8c6fc77ab5_z

A majority of institutional investors believe ESG factors have a positive impact on investment returns, and more than 75 percent of institutional investors incorporate ESG factors into their allocation decisions, according to a study from LGT Capital Partners and Mercer.

What’s more, ESG criteria have only very recently become important for most investors.

The study surveyed nearly 100 institutional investors in 22 countries. More findings, summarized by PlanSponsor:

* More than three-quarters of respondents incorporate ESG criteria when investing in alternative asset classes.

* More than half (57%) believe incorporating ESG criteria has a positive impact on risk-adjusted returns. A mere 9% think it lowers returns.

* Regarded with significance are issues with the potential to impact a company’s long-term risk, reputation or overall performance. Topics garnering strong support include carbon intensity, controversial weapons and bribery and corruption, while exclusionary criteria such as alcohol or tobacco are rarely considered.

* Among the institutional investors who incorporate ESG criteria into investment decision-making, 54% have done so for three years or less. This suggests rising expectations for investment managers over time, as well as a need for greater clarity on techniques and strategies for ESG incorporation to help investors progress more quickly.

You can find the full study here.

 

Photo by Satya via Flickr CC License


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /home/mhuddelson/public_html/pension360.org/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 3712