New Jersey Pension Encounters Difficulty Exiting Investment With Firm At Which Mary Pat Christie Holds Top Job

No Exit

It’s been nearly four years since New Jersey’s pension system terminated an investment with Angelo, Gordon & Co, an investment firm where Mary Pat Christie, wife of Gov. Chris Christie, is managing director.

But as the International Business Times reports, the pension system is still paying fees to the firm because certain portions of the investment are particularly illiquid – the pension system has yet to be able to exit them fully.

Some say the situation is a troubling conflict of interest. Others say it is emblematic of one of the criticisms of alternative investments: pension funds can’t exit whenever they like.

From the International Business Times:

When the New Jersey pension system terminated a $150 million investment in a fund called Angelo, Gordon & Co. in 2011, that did not close the books on the deal. In the three years since state officials ordered the withdrawal of that state money, New Jersey taxpayers have forked over hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees to the firm. As those fees kept flowing, Angelo Gordon made a prominent hire: Mary Pat Christie, wife of Gov. Chris Christie, who joined the company in 2012 as a managing director and now earns $475,000 annually, according to the governor’s most recent tax return.

The disclosure that New Jersey taxpayers have been paying substantial fees to a firm that employs the governor’s spouse — years after state officials said the investment was terminated — emerged in documents released by the Christie administration to International Business Times through a public records request.

[…]

New Jersey’s original $150 million investment in Angelo Gordon was initiated in 2006, under Gov. Jon Corzine, a Democrat. By October 2011, state records show, the investment — which was in a multi-strategy hedge fund called AG Garden Partners — had generated just a 5.5 percent return in six years. That month, New Jersey investment officials sent a letter telling the firm to “withdraw, as of December 31, 2011, one hundred percent of the [state’s] capital account.” Yet the state subsequently paid Angelo Gordon management fees of more than $255,000 in 2012, more than $132,000 in 2013 and more than $82,000 for the first three quarters of 2014.

[New Jersey Treasury Department] Spokesman Santarelli told IBTimes that while “New Jersey redeemed its interest in the AG fund and ended its investment [in 2011] we still have a remaining market value of $6.6 million invested related to illiquid investments, which have been winding down slowly over the last few years.”

New Jersey State Investment Council chairman Thomas Byrne gave his reaction to the IB Times:

“This is standard; we are not doing something different here that is outside the norms of the financial industry and the world of private partnerships,” he said.

“We are paying fees on whatever money is left in there, so it could be an asset that could be increasing in value,” Byrne said. “So why should the manager work for free if they are hamstrung in the short term but they have made an investment that makes sense? A contract is a contract and presumably both sides are working in good faith to get out of it, and a deal is a deal.”

Read the entire IB Times report here.

 

Photo by  Timothy Appnel via Flickr CC License

Unions Sue Over Chicago Pension Cuts

chicago

Chicago unions and public employees filed a lawsuit Tuesday to block pension changes coming in 2015 that would reduce future COLA increases and require workers to pay more toward their retirement.

From the International Business Times:

The law in question is scheduled to take effect in the new year and will slash pension benefits for workers and retirees in Chicago’s Municipal Employees Annuity and Benefit Fund and Board of Trustees of the Municipal Employee’s Annuity and Benefit Fund, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit, filed in Cook County Circuit Court, argued Public Act 98-0641 violates a provision and “straightforward promise” in the Illinois Constitution that forbids the diminishment or impairment of public employee retirement benefits. The lawsuit stated that the pension reform law, which was enacted in June, unlawfully reduces pension benefits for the plaintiffs and all others who chose a public-service career.

“Unless this court strikes down and enjoins implementation of the Act, Plaintiffs and thousands of other current and retired City of Chicago and Chicago Board of Education employees will be harmed and the trust that all Illinois citizens place in the inviolability of their Constitution will be breached,” the lawsuit stated.

The plaintiffs, comprised of 12 current and former workers and four unions, requested the court declare Public Act 98-0641 entirely “unconstitutional, void and unenforceable.” Current retirees will suffer immediately, while the same “injustice” awaits current public workers when they retire, according to the lawsuit.

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel said the law was created with the support of many unions and is both constitutional and necessary to ensure 61,000 city workers and retirees receive pensions. “Without this reform, these two funds will run out of money in just a matter of years, which is why we must defend this law to protect the future of our workers, retirees, and taxpayers,” Emanuel said in a statement.

At the end of 2012, the city’s six pension funds were collectively 50 percent funded.

 

Photo by bitsorf via Flickr CC LIcense

San Diego Pension’s Risk Reduction Yields Mixed Short-Term Results

graphs and numbers

A series of investment policy changes made by the board of the San Diego County Employees Retirement Association (SDCERA) have saved the fund from losing tens of millions – but also prevented the fund from realizing tens of millions in returns during the third quarter.

Pension funds are particularly long-term investors and no investment policy should be judged based on one quarter’s worth of results, but the outcomes of SDCERA’s allocation changes are fascinating nonetheless.

From Bloomberg:

San Diego County’s pension fund avoided a $100 million loss in the third quarter by reducing its reliance on Treasury bonds although it forfeited about $114.4 million in gains in the past three months because it rolled back its “risk-parity” strategy, the fund’s investment adviser said in a report.

In April, the board of the San Diego County Employees Retirement Association lowered the fund’s fixed-income target to 15 percent from 60 percent by eliminating Treasuries and reducing fixed-income investments and inflation-protected securities. That helped cushion the fund from $100 million in losses in the three months ended Sept. 30, according to the report by Houston-based Salient Partners LP, which manages the $10.1 billion portfolio.

Instead, the fund for 39,000 current and retired county employees lost $4 million.

In September, the board reduced the amount of money that could be invested in futures and derivatives contracts, the so-called risk-parity category the board created in April at the urging of Lee Partridge, Salient’s chief investment officer.

Partridge objected to the September move. With retirees urging board members to reduce exposure to risk, they voted 5-2 to make the change.

Since then, the fund has lost out on about $114.4 million in returns, according to Partridge’s report.

Partridge and Dan Flores, a spokesman for the San Diego County Employees Retirement Association, declined to comment until the board discusses the report on Dec. 18.

SDCERA’s board voted to fire its outsourced CIO, Salient Partners, last month.

 

Photo by Andreas Poike via Flickr CC License

Canada Pension Invests $157 Million in Indian Engineering Firm

CanadaThe Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) has made a $157 million in the infrastructure arm of an Indian engineering company.

The investment is the first direct investment in an Indian infrastructure firm by a Canadian pension fund. The $157 million is only the first installment in CPPIB’s commitment, which totals $314 million.

Details from VC Circle:

Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) has invested Rs 1,000 crore (around $157 million) in L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Ltd (L&T IDPL), a unit of Larsen and Toubro Ltd (L&T), by way of subscription to compulsorily convertible preference shares, as per a stock market disclosure.

The investment, made through CPPIB’s Singapore-based wholly owned subsidiary, is the first tranche of proposed Rs 2,000 crore (around $314 million now) investment that was approved by the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB), the nodal government body monitoring foreign investment in the country, earlier this year.

The two companies signed a definitive investment agreement in June this year.

“A second tranche of Rs 1,000 crore or such higher amount as may be agreed between L&T IDPL and CPPIB’s subsidiary, will be invested after 12 months from the date of the initial investment, subject to any required regulatory approvals at such time,” L&T said in the statement.

CPPIB manages $234.4 in assets.

Washington Pension Manager Commits $1.1 Billion to REOCs

Washington stateThe Washington State Investment Board, the entity that manages Washington state’s pension assets, has committed a total of $1.1 billion to two funds that invest in real estate operating companies (REOCs).

From IPE Real Estate:

Commitments of $600m and $500m were made to Calzada Capital Partners and Evergreen Real Estate Partners, respectively.

[…]

Calzada, which buys real estate operating companies in the Americas, places capital with companies investing in major property sectors.

It has around $4bn in assets under management.

The private equity firm has invested in Terramar Retail Centers, which owns neighbourhood shopping centres on the US West Coast, as well as in Corporate Properties of the Americas, which owns industrial property in Mexico.

Hometown America, an owner and operator of manufactured housing, Pacific Beachcomber, a luxury hospitality renovation firm in French Polynesia and Pivotal Capital Group have also received capital as part of Calzada’s niche investment strategy.

Evergreen, which invests in US-based real estate operating companies, will use capital for future growth.

The company mostly makes investments in the office, industrial, retail and apartment sectors.

The Board manages $103.6 billion in assets.

 

Photo credit: “Washington Wikiproject” by Chetblong – Own work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

Memphis Council Approves Hybrid Pension Plan; Changes Will Affect Many Current Workers

Memphis City Council

After several meetings worth of debate, the Memphis City Council passed major changes to the city’s pension system on Tuesday – and the changes won’t just affect new hires.

Details of the new hybrid plan, reported by Fox Memphis:

Council passed a hybrid plan that was backed by Councilwoman Wanda Halbert that grandfathers in current employees with 7.5 years of experience, effective July 1, 2016.

This plan was introduced by Councilwoman Halbert, who drew harsh criticism from the crowd despite that her plan was approved.

So what does it mean? New hires and city employees with less than 7.5 years on the job will switch over to a new pension system. It mixes a retirement account with a defined contributions plan. Her plan only introduced two weeks ago after Councilman Myron Lowery introduced his plan that would only apply to new hires.

City employees in the crown expressed their anger over the changes. From Fox Memphis:

Members in the audience, many of them city employees, agreed with Councilman Lowery and blasted Councilwoman Halbert saying she had betrayed the city.

[…]

“This was an embarrassment to the City of Memphis that they make decisions that are that callous with that little bit of research on he table,” ,” said Kathy Hurley of Memphis. “If you just watch the film and see what all went on it’s obvious the right hand doesn’t know what the left hand it doing. It’s sad.”

Labor groups will likely sue over the changes.

Canada Pensions Look For Opportunities in Energy Slump

oil barrels

The Canada Pension Plan Investment Board was weighing a bid for Talisman Energy Inc. – the Board decided against it, at the company ended up being bought Tuesday morning by Repsol SA.

But the interest the Board displayed in troubled Talisman Energy is emblematic of a larger trend: Canada’s pension funds are looking for opportunity in the midst of a serious energy slump.

From Bloomberg:

The 22 percent slump in Canadian energy stocks since late November is just the kind of event that can create opportunity for investors such as pension funds, said Ron Mock, head of the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan.

“Sometimes that happens when everybody is heading out the door and we actually use our long-term advantage to go in,” Mock, chief executive officer of Ontario Teachers, the country’s third-biggest pension fund, said during an interview at Bloomberg’s office in Toronto last week. The energy market doesn’t appear to have quite bottomed for Teachers yet, he said.

Lower energy prices will reduce companies’ cash flows and eventually put pressure on them to weigh their capital plans for next year, Mock said. That will have some producers looking for investors, or outright takeovers, he said.

[…]

Ontario Teachers isn’t consciously counter-cyclical in its investment strategy, Mock said. The focus is on value-oriented, long-term investments, a strategy that tends to provide it with opportunities during both the ups and downs of the market, he said.

[…]

Mark Wiseman, CEO of Canada Pension, said on Nov. 13 that the plunge in oil prices might offer investment opportunities in Canada’s energy sector.

“We are seeing a period now where there may be increasing opportunity in the Western Canadian basin and Canadian energy companies as the market sort of reprices,” Wiseman said.

[…]

One of Ontario Teachers key concerns about investing in Canada’s oil patch is the potential for regulatory changes, Mock said. This doesn’t dissuade the pension fund from investing in the oil and gas sector, he said, but it does raise concerns that certain assets might become too expensive to develop, he said.

The pension fund also will consider investments based on environmental factors.

 

Photo by ezioman via Flickr CC License

California Senator Formulating Bill to Force CalSTRS, CalPERS to Divest From Coal

smoke stack

California Senate President Kevin de León said Monday he may introduce a bill in 2015 that would require the state’s pension systems – CalPERS and CalSTRS, two of the largest systems in the world – to divest from coal-related investments.

The bill wouldn’t cover oil or gas investments.

The legislation seems to be in its earliest stages.

The move would be a controversial one not just for the fiduciary complications involved. The Center for Retirement Research has done work on the subject of social investing (and divesting) and found that outcomes may not favor pension funds.

More from SF Gate:

The state Senate’s top leader said at an Oakland forum organized by billionaire environmental activist Tom Steyer that he’s planning to introduce a measure next year to require the state’s public-employee pension funds to sell their coal-related investments.

“Climate change is the top priority of the California state Senate,” said Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de León, D-Los Angeles. He said his legislation would require that the California Public Employees Retirement System, which manages public employees’ pensions and health benefits, and the California State Teachers Retirement System divest millions of dollars in coal-related investments.

“Coal is a dirty fossil fuel, and we generate very little electricity in California from coal,” de León said. “And I think our values should shift in California.”

De León, who just returned from an international climate-change summit in Peru, said he hadn’t worked out the specifics of his bill but that it would be limited to coal investments. He said it would not extend to all fossil-fuel holdings such as those in oil and gas production.

“We’re working out all the (divestment) details,” he said. “We’re talking about a way that’s smart and intelligent, not a way that hurts investment strategies.”

Climate-change activists have been pushing large investors to shed their holdings in coal, a major contributor to greenhouse gases. CalPERS, the nation’s largest public pension fund with $300 billion in investments, would be the environmental movement’s biggest prize should de León be able to push his legislation into law.

CalPERS manages $295 billion in assets. CalSTRS manages $187 billion in assets.

 

Photo by  Paul Falardeau via Flickr CC License

CalPERS To Work New Guiding Principle Into Portfolio Analysis

building

According to a Pensions & Investments report, CalPERS’ investment staff have begun working a new guiding philosophy into their portfolio analysis: whether a strategy is “repeatable, predictable and scalable”.

The mantra came about when the fund was reviewing its hedge fund portfolio. But Wylie A. Tollette, chief operating investment officer, wants to work the philosophy into the fund’s entire portfolio.

From Pensions & Investments:

Mr. Tollette told the $295.7 billion California Public Employees’ Retirement System’s investment committee that the three principles were used in the determination to end CalPERS’ hedge fund program in September, and will now be used to analyze whether other parts of the portfolio are measuring up to investment return and risk standards.

“We want to apply the same principles to the entire portfolio,” Mr. Tollette said in an interview after making his comments to the board. Mr. Tollette said in the interview no decision has been made to cut any other investment strategy for the CalPERS portfolio, but he did say investment staffers are examining the pension fund’s forestland portfolio and its multiasset-class strategies, among others.

Like CalPERS’ hedge fund portfolio, which made up only 1.1% of the total portfolio, forestland and the multiasset-class strategies are small — forestland made up 0.8% of CalPERS’ portfolio as of Oct. 31, while multasset-class strategies made up 0.4%.

Mr. Tollette said in the interview while hedge funds were cut because it was determined the asset class was not scalable, he said that just because an asset class is small doesn’t mean it doesn’t play a strategic purpose in the CalPERS portfolio. He said the review will be looking at the roles some of CalPERS’ portfolios play in the total risk-return portfolio.

CalPERS managed $295 billion in assets as of September 30, 2014.

 

Photo by  rocor via Flickr CC License

Ohio Police and Fire Pension To Invest Additional $200 Million in Real Estate in 2015

businessman holding small model house in his hands

The Ohio Police and Fire Pension Fund has set aside $200 million to be allocated to real estate in 2015. It plans to make a series of investments, sized from $40 million to $70 million, to as-yet-unnamed managers

From IPE Real Estate:

The capital is being allocated as part of the pension fund’s 2015 real estate investment plan, with some capital to be invested outside the US, including Europe and Asia.

Ohio Police & Fire said it would only consider tactical or non-core opportunities via funds.

It said its current real estate portfolio had reached its allocation levels for core real estate, and that it would not be conducting any new manager searches.

The investor will receive recommendations from The Townsend Group on where capital will be invested.

Potential new investments will range from $40m to $70m.

Ohio Police & Fire’s portfolio is currently valued at $1.4bn, or 9.6% of its total investment portfolio, as of the end of November.

The fund has a 12% targeted allocation for real estate.

The pension fund’s most recent commitment was approved last month, an allocation of up to $50m for AEW Partners VII, a fund that buys distressed US properties in primary and secondary markets.

The Ohio Police and Fire Pension Fund manages $14.52 billion in assets.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /home/mhuddelson/public_html/pension360.org/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 3712